Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton Survey "Resign" Yes or NO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: drakemallard who wrote (20)	9/16/1998 7:57:00 AM
From: nougie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 697

NO. The American people should have a say in whether Clinton stays in office. After all, they are the ones that voted him in.

To: drakemallard who wrote (20)	9/16/1998 8:12:00 AM
From: Milton Grubbs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 697

I AGREE, He should not resign! What are we to gain from his resignation? Compare his accomplishments to this (very) partisan witch hunt that is underway and it will be clear which is more important, to the most of us anyway!!! I too voted against Clinton twice, however I do believe he has out done himself. He has truly done the peoples work over the last six years. Needless to say he has shown that he has a serious case of dumb-ass disease, and that he is as vulnerable as any man. How a man of his background and education could stoop so low can not be explained with any word besides madness! I do not condone what he did nor do I feel that his actions merit the barrage of coverage that this case is getting. I wonder how many of the other Federal Servants (Senators and Congressmen) would stand up to the same five year long probe into their lives???

To: drakemallard who wrote (20)	9/16/1998 11:01:00 AM
From: Cage Rattler	Respond to of 697

DM: Step back and consider the effect of defending a President who is so tainted. It makes good sense for the DNC to recognize the continuing vulnerability of this president to perpetual attack. He has committed the offences outlined by Starr -- he was off sides and got caught on replay -- to use a sports analogy he's fouled out of the game. He's not the only man on the team. Send him to the showers and get Gore in there. Let's get on with the game. To do otherwise may cause irreparable damage the Democratic Party and country. Sexgate establishes "impeachment" as used in a courtroom -- he lied under oath. This will forever taint Clinton's credibility. Were I Starr, after establishing that he twisted fact to his convenience, I would slowly dribble out injurious investigation findings to be irrationally defended by political loyalists. Perhaps Clinton acts as the "Prince," as suggested by Jack Clark's post, but Starr has taken a few chapters from Mao's methodology! Why are we acting as though Clinton is the sole alternative as a Democratic president? Perhaps, but let's hope not. Ciao, Ted

To: drakemallard who wrote (20)	9/16/1998 2:09:00 PM
From: Steve	Respond to of 697

< Resign? NO!!! The Republicans took control of the house in 1948, what did we get? Witch hunts, McCarthyism, blacklisting ect. It took 40 years for people to forget, and now their back in control, "trying to get at the truth" (?) I'm pissed at Clinton for his behavior, but I also judge a man by the character of his enemies... 70% of the people want him to stay in office. If the Republicans run him out of office against the wishes of the people, it'll be ANOTHER 40 years before we have to deal with House Republicans again> HELLO this is not 1948, it's 1998 and no one made Clinton drop his draws or do things with a cigar that he did. No one made him LIE to a grand jury. Him lying has nothing to do with Democrat or Republican it has to do with he LIED. As for your 70% were do you guys come up with those numbers. Your like a hypster trying to get a stock to go up. Even us Democrtas can see this now. we got LIED to.