SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (5983)9/16/1998 2:08:00 PM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 13994
 
He presented the unbiased facts. No one is disputing them. The opinion he also presented, which is debatable ( barely), is that these fact can and should lead to impeachment.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (5983)9/16/1998 2:13:00 PM
From: Les H  Respond to of 13994
 
Starr is a prosecutor. His job is not the defense of the president.
To get at all of the facts, one has to examine the unreleased grand jury transcripts, the tapes, and the 2000 pages of other evidence.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (5983)9/16/1998 2:57:00 PM
From: Scrapps  Respond to of 13994
 
" The question is whether Starr can produce an unbiased representation of facts against Clinton"

That is an oxymoronic statement..IMO. Any facts brought forward against Clinton are going to be biased, they can't be unbiased...can they?

That explains why it is felt Starr either has some things against Clinton in Whitewater, Travelgate, Filegate or he has nothing.

Biased would apply to someone judging...not investigating, again...IMO.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News