Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Franco & Euro Nevada FN , EN -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ronald Tammekand who wrote (314)	9/16/1998 9:28:00 PM
From: ForYourEyesOnly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 658

Pls explain why you think Cerro San Pedro is a turd....I am currently looking at buying Metallica & would like your feedback. Thanks! THC

To: Ronald Tammekand who wrote (314)	10/2/1998 10:08:00 AM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 658

<<The only thing that I don't like in their portfolio is Cerro San Pedro in Mexico, which is a turd.>> Although the gold grade is low, the silver content brings up the value of this property. What do you think of the feasibility study at US$169 cost/ounce. Also, I think Cambior is after a much bigger target than these 50M tons of oxides. The potential for sulpides resources several times this size underneath the oxides is probably why CBJ is in. They have the long term in vue. MR is certainly not the best short/medium gold play. I prefer the Viceroy, Glamis&Mar-West and GEO....but it is a very valid play for the long term. That is why Franco is in.