Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (3231)	9/16/1998 6:40:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 67261

After the Starr report you think the mention of a prior affair of one of the moral police will cause a backlash? ha ha ha No I dont think so...... laughter is more like it...... MH

To: jlallen who wrote (3231)	9/16/1998 6:55:00 PM
From: lazarre	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

JLA, that's not the point but nice try. The question should rather be this: if Hyde or Burton, or anyone else---D or R--- was queried about their private life---sexual, medical, otherwise---in a purely political context, would they be as willing to tell the truth? knowing that the truth was to be used as a weapon against them or their agenda and not for its intrinsic value?. As for Salon being a shill for the WH--not anymore so than the Spectator or Weekly Standard being a shill for the other side of the isle; though I find it interesting that Salon regularly features Horowitz and C.Hitchens---hardly personal or philosophical pals of the Prez. One thinks he's too left, the other, too right. L