SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (3249)9/16/1998 7:24:00 PM
From: dougjn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Unconvincing and insufficient. A choice had to be, was going to be, and was made. We are often confronting with poor choices. They still are made. To contribute only by default is not admirable.

Now if there was some family emergency on election day or something that would be different.

I do not find your explanation the least bit admirable. I find it a bit infantile.

You obviously should have voted for Bush, given your apparent views, but you were sore, and acted in an infantile way. I don't respect that.

Is it forgivable? Sure. But you don't seem to grant much of that to others. Which makes me not much interested in granting it to you.

Doug



To: Les H who wrote (3249)9/16/1998 8:43:00 PM
From: Hiram Walker  Respond to of 67261
 
Les, there is absolutely no rational reason not to vote,absolutely none. Remember the most important people to you,and your family is not the president,but your local officials. From state congressman,down to local representative,those are the people who can directly impact your life.
Hiram


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News