SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER) who wrote (6104)9/16/1998 11:24:00 PM
From: alan w  Respond to of 13994
 
I'd give Clinton the thumbs up if he gave the American people 30 solid minutes of excellence. Nah, too much to ask of him.

alan w

.....
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhhahahahahahah



To: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER) who wrote (6104)9/17/1998 1:18:00 AM
From: greenspirit  Respond to of 13994
 
Bateman, it's honorable to show the kind of blind support you give this administration, but they really don't deserve it. I realize you have despised Republicans for a long time, but just like Nixon woke up blind Republicans, it's time to smell the coffee and find a new leader for your party.

Having an administration this corrupt doesn't do justice to the decent Democrats out there who really care about values.

From Draft dodging, tax fraud, futures scams, secret task forces, travelgate, zippergate, chinagate, filegate and the constant lying, lying, lying, this administration has demonstrated they do not represent Democratic American values.

The country will do just fine under Al Gore's stewardship.

Michael



To: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER) who wrote (6104)9/17/1998 10:03:00 AM
From: Hunter Vann  Respond to of 13994
 
No just a Mirror Image...and this needs more investigating...after all Clinton had someone
on his back fer years.


Quick Point: Wrecking a marriage is not illegal. Lying under oath is. See the difference? You're making us Democrats look pretty bad...