Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j g cordes who wrote (3340)	9/17/1998 6:57:00 AM
From: micny	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

>>>to directly cause harm to our system of government through political sabotage. That is a clear condition for impeachment. --It is A condition for impeachment, but it isn't the only one! Violating one's oath of office is another, and clearly, Clinton did. >>>Clinton and Lewinsky's acts were against themselves and against their respective families. --True, up to the point that he perjured himself in the PJ case....then followed that with more perjury, witness tampering etc etc., at which point he consciously abandoned any intent to uphold his oath of office and was clearly acting to subvert the administration of justice.

To: j g cordes who wrote (3340)	9/17/1998 11:08:00 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

No, I never did any of those things. Stop accusing regular people of being jerks, just to make Clinton look regular. I wasn't lamely trying to say a breakin is as bad as sex. You miss the point entirely. The point is the COVER-UP took Nixon down, not the break-in, which he didn't commit or order. The COVER-UP is going to take Clinton down as well. It is manefested in perjury obstruction and abuse of power. That was my point in answering your hypothetical question.