Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cool who wrote (6124)	9/17/1998 2:40:00 AM
From: Scrapps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

If he (Hyde) is guilty of perjury, then he must have been sworn in or had taken an oath...that's the criteria, as I understand it. The thing which, could be applied, would be his wedding vows. Then of course, that type of perjury is handled in a divorce court, where his wife would impeach him. Daddycool, you have the great ability to lump everything into one big pile where it doesn't make a damned bit of sense. See if you can sort things out into the separate issues they are. Doing so would help you make your points...or at least get them listened to, it's a divide and conquer type of thing. If you keep lumping everything into one, the next thing we'll be talking about will be Bob Barker (I envy him) and the price is right models.

To: cool who wrote (6124)	9/19/1998 7:08:00 PM
From: Diane	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

Hyde continues to perjure himself I think you better look up the definition of perjury. and you defend him I didn't (and don't) defend him. I just said it's a whole different situation from Clinton. Again, what Clinton did with Monica is their business. What he said under oath is the publics business. Hydes problem "Its ancient history" --Whitewater isn't? How 'bout travelgate, chinagate, filegate etc. Even Whitewater is not nearly as ancient as Hyde's affair - at least when the investigation started it wasn't. And the only reason it's gone on this long is that it's very complicated (by design) and Clinton hasn't done anything to help move the investigation along. few if, any congressmen can stand up to the scrutiny that Clinton has. If that's true, this country is in BIG trouble. Future candidates better be saints, have empty closets I'd vote for that.