Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Moominoid who wrote (28138)	9/17/1998 9:14:00 AM
From: James F. Hopkins	Respond to of 94695

David; ( OT) We already have the IMF like it or not , of course we all ready have the FED, but that's not to say the nature of them couldn't be changed. ( of course I don't think that would happen without a fight ). None the less my statement I'm sure was overly simple, mearly to point out there are ways to change things and ways to track, trace , and tax, ( thus limit) huge currency swaps that are done for no other purpose than consolidate power by destroying another nations capital. I'm sure if the tax were spilt up each country getting a cut if and when it's currency was sold, they would have reps there and the IMF would not be anything like it is now. If they served a purpose, & were made self supporting with representatives from every nation looking in on their activities I would be tempted to endorse their existence. I'm not the kill the one world government freak you imply , in fact I approve of the U.N. What I oppose is this invisible Government that works in a hegemonic fashion & has a goal of taking over the world. You may can live in denial about their existence if you chose to, but I don't have that luxury. ------------------ Have you ever read anything about ; Weishaupt and his inner circle of adepts, or the historian, Albert G. Mackey, who describes a "secret society, founded on May 1, 1776 by Adam Weishaupt, & who was professor of canon law at the University of Ingolstadt. Even George Washington became convinced of it's existence, and issued a warning about the same. Basically it was an anarchistic inner circle who's aim was to exploit any and all governments. It supposedly disbanded after coming under heavy criticism, but far to much of what happens today causes me to be convinced that the nucleus survived, and went even more secretive, and has grown in power. I assume they have also undergone a name change. If you don't have time to go to the library and read up on secret societies , you could look up enough in almost any encyclopedia to see they have been with us almost as long as history has been recorded. I'm not talking about the Masons who it seems often get a bad rap, I'm talking about pure out criminal ones which are very hard to expose. Who can work incognito and infiltrate almost every level of society. We may never be able to rid society of them, but there are ways to limit their power by closing some of the doors they use to carry out their predatory feeding. It's seems to me any one who calls attention to this is labeled a radical very quickly, of course that only helps them continue. ------------------- If you knew the power in organized deception, even at it's lower levels, would you be able to resist becoming a member, and dining at the table of corpses they collect. --------------------- Apparently even the sanctimonious Swiss bankers could not resist that temptation when it came to Holocaust victims. Jim PS. Meanwhile I can see how the Rich get richer, the poor poorer, but ironically so often the poor help to arrange it.