Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (6000)	9/17/1998 9:54:00 AM
From: Just My Opinion	Respond to of 26163

Why do you ask me a question,and then answer it? I paid good money to post here,and I want to get my money's worth. Wahh! You are right about people that 'promote" a stock. They should be asked to justify their claims. However, I get the impression that most of the discussions on SI companies are about nonsensical stuff to most of us. People that state repetitively that the company must comply with laws, etc, etc, blah blah blah or else. DUH!!! What company doesn't have to comply with the laws. I have seen both sides whine about the publishing of the fax's, (whatever the heck they are about, by now I am so bored with that BS, I forgot what they are both talkin about) but guess what..IMO NEITHER side has published anything of much importance, and no one who is reading the thread is any better off than they were from post one, are they. Well we have learned a lot about herbs, I guess. Is there a squeeze in the works? Yes..No... Who knows. But this is the fault IMO of BOTH sides.. IMO..No one is presenting any real info here, it's all just a big debate between snotty college types (ivy league, of course, sniff), and psuedo "blue collar" (grrr) types. Of course that is what SI is all about, isn't it? I don't now why people even bother to name these SI BB threads. Why not just call them "thread number 1, thread number 1a, thread number 1b etc etc"?