Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (8006)	9/17/1998 2:34:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Respond to of 42834

It is just that some people realize that plain ol' lying and lying under oath are the same, dude! It has now come to light that the other paragon of virtue, Mr. Henry Hyde, was also screwing around. Hardly shocking. If you know how sleazy those characters really are, behind their veneer of respectability. But that one was a case of "youthful indiscretion" at age 41, after getting married and fathering kid/s, wasn't it?! Yeah, right! We have lost "the ability for independent thinking", so we'll fall for that! ;-) And moreover, "he didn't lie under oath, he only lied!". Yeah, we shall fall for that one too! So, if they are all lechers, we would rather have someone who has respect for human life at least. So that should rule out self-serving hypocrites who think that they have a direct line to God, like that sanctimonious ass, William Bennett. What was his response to the murder of Archbishop Romero and the nuns murdered by members of the Salvadoran National Guard? Nothing, huh? If we broaden the topic of morality beyond the scope of sexuality, it is clear that these pompous asses stand naked! So, it is not that we consider Clinton is a saint. Clearly, he is not. It is just that the fetid hypocrisy of self-proclaimed keepers of morals that makes some of us feel like throwing up. Dipy.