Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton Survey "Resign" Yes or NO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve who wrote (219)	9/17/1998 1:46:00 PM
From: port_mgr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 697

Yes. He should resign and then commit suicide by shooting himself in the back of the head with a rifle, or better yet, smoke some pot and fall asleep with his head on a train track.

To: Steve who wrote (219)	9/17/1998 2:41:00 PM
From: Milton Grubbs	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 697

Steve whether he had approval or not, the process is still out of control. When the "White Water" (remember that) investigation started it was known at the onset that they did not have enough to come even close to Clinton, yet Starr tried anyway. Now it turns out we paid over $30 million for a $300 K crime that Clinton was never associated with. Not a very high ROI if you ask me. From there Starr was driven by the fact that he turned it into a personal and political goal to find some s--t to stick to Mr. Teflon. All the leaks and taping (who knows what other tactics were used) were done illegally and with Starr believing that he had a literal "Card Blanche" to do anything he wanted to. I think the jury is still out on who really broke the law here. . . Think about all the innocent lives that have been forever changed by Mr. Starr's quest to get the bad guy. At some point some sane person needs to say enough is enough, stop the madness! Imagine, if you will, a government that feels that it can barge into anyone's private life and make a case against those that have a different opinion or party affiliation. Sound familiar. . .