SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greenspirit who wrote (6321)9/17/1998 10:33:00 PM
From: Doughboy  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 13994
 
I'm not "afraid" of it. I'm not even sure I've decided whether it should be made public or not. But I don't think it's judicious to rush out there and make these things public before they've been vetted by Starr and congressional staff. For example, with the report, why didn't they check and see if Starr wanted certain parts of the report kept under wraps? There is so much extraneous, irrelevant, harmful, unfair stuff in the report (e.g. the intimations about a tryst between Clinton and Eleanor Mondale, the footnotes about Clinton masturbating after his sessions with Lewinsky) it's appalling. It would have taken a week to edit it for public consumption. As for the GJ testimony who's to know whether Starr asked a whole bunch of fishing expedition questions which may intimate conduct that should not be made known to the public because it is not substantiated. Grand jury secrecy is designed to protect not only the target (who may be undeserving of its protection), it is also designed to protect third parties who are not involved in any illegality and who will be hurt by their being exposed in grand jury testimony. If Hyde and the GOP hasn't even taken the time to see the GJ testimony, redact it to protect the innocent, and think about the implications of doing this, then I do believe it is a rush to judgment and I condemn it.

Doughboy.