SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bmart who wrote (6225)9/18/1998 9:54:00 AM
From: s martin  Respond to of 26163
 
Looks like you're coming unglued or have you forgotten that the frequent use of "caps" when posting is indicative of the Pugs we all know and loved. You seem to have lost the gentility you once exhibited.

Now about Dr. Daaboul... did you meet with him in your Pugs attire or were you wearing your BMart "buisness" suit?



To: bmart who wrote (6225)9/18/1998 9:54:00 AM
From: tonto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26163
 
ROFL, give it up, you have been caught.

yet Mr. Pug's told me he has not gotten one phone call or emaill transmission from ANY OF YOU!

This one is a keeper and printed.



To: bmart who wrote (6225)9/18/1998 11:48:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26163
 
"Hurts that bad to know Pugs took you for a ride doesn't it??

Ask Ellen how she feels about Pugs reliability in picking winners for her portfolio.

Regards,

Ron"


Bmart, I would like to know where, in the above PM you are referring to, that I stated Ellen discussed anything about her stock picks.

I only suggested that you ask her. I did not state that I had spoken or corresponded with her about anything.

You jumped to the conclusion without appropriate evidence to support your position. Kinda like your claims about AZNT and RMIL.

It is quite evident that she has been a follower of these "short squeeze" story stocks that are presented by you, Pugs, and RileyG. I only assumed that she had also invested in both RMIL and AZNT since her comments imply her having a position. Thus, it is safe to assume that she has lost money on your picks. "Picks" where you consistently ignore or deny derogatory evidence that all is not as it seems.

I suggest to you sir, that "thou doth protest too much". Only you are responsible for bringing about your hype about Dr. Daaboul (which you claim is an invasion of your privacy).

I merely suggested that Pugs led you into pushing TON upon Dr. Daaboul in a ploy to create a fantasy scenario wherein Dr. Daaboul would embark upon a test of the products merits. If Pugs was not involved in this charade, then I am mistaken.

But you have given no indication that Pugs was not behind this ploy and I believe that is why people are questioning you about your connection to him.

Regards,

Ron