Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: john who wrote (3543)	9/18/1998 10:34:00 AM
From: j_b	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<< Why shouldn't Henry Hydes affairs be made public and if it happened to be the Clinton spin Doctors so be it.>> The affair has already been made public. We'll see who was responsible, and why. For example, if it was the WH, it may be bad publicity for them, but is it illegal? If it was the WH, and it is seen as attempting to intimidate the committee, Clinton is history, even if the "leak" was legal. My issue is not with Hyde's affair being brought to the public notice, but that it was done to deflect attention from the Clinton crisis. We need to deal with this issue on its merits, and not cloud it with un-related smoke. Hyde can be dealt with after the Clinton issue is decided.