Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (53197)	9/18/1998 10:41:00 AM
From: Linda Kaplan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58727

Lisa, I didn't say that but I remember reading it. Linda

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (53197)	9/18/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: donald sew	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58727

Lisa, >>>>>>>> can you tell me again why you think we are not in a trading range? <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ?????????????????? Technically, we are in a trading range as per my recent index update. Personally and subjectively, I still do have a negative outlook towards the market, but on the technical and analytical side it the arguement is still in favor of a trading range. On many occassions my subjective beliefs are opposite to what my technicals indicate. I realise that is very hard for many to understand how to differentiate between the two. Actually it is relative easy when one has a system that says above 95 - SELL, and below 5 - BUY. An example is that if I subjectively feel the market is going higher, but my technicals has a reading of 85, which is high I will not enter a trade to the upside. This past TUE/WED I subjectively felt and feared a strong movement up as many did. A precise technical/mechanical system helps eliminate the subjective and emotions from making a decision. Many may argue that the subjective is required, to which I can only use the success rate of my system to argue that point. Seeya BM