Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: john who wrote (3552)	9/18/1998 10:49:00 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I didn't know Henry Hyde was a perjurer and obstructor of justice. I say throw him out if he did as Clinton did.

To: john who wrote (3552)	9/18/1998 11:49:00 AM
From: j_b	Respond to of 67261

<<very simple but I can see it is away beyond your understanding.... thank god all 5 year olds would understand. >> These types of attacks are what I was referring to. They add nothing to the discussion, and resolve nothing. I did not get into a mud-slinging contest, and (previous to your last post) neither did you. We need to deal with the Clinton issue on its merits. As you so aptly put it, thank god all 5-year-olds would understand. Unfortunately, both sides are so caught up in protecting their side and advancing their causes, that they are not looking at what's best for the nation and our future. <<What Henry hyde lying for thirty years and living a lie for thirty years is something to tell the children,,,,,,,,,,,,>> Fine, tell the children, pillory Hyde, get him expelled from Congress or whatever. Just deal with the Clinton issues first - they have far more ramifications on the running of the country and on our future. Hyde is only one vote out of hundreds. He can't commit us to war, he can't do anything by himself. Clinton can, and the world knows that. We need to either give Clinton back the ability to run his part of the government, or take it away and give it to someone else. Which part of that sentiment do you disagree with?