Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jim kelley who wrote (3557)	9/18/1998 11:17:00 AM
From: Dorine Essey	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Jim, Did you know that there was a huge road side bulletin board in Arkansas showing a large blown up photo of Bill Clinton our President with this " HAVE YOU HAD SEX with Bill Clinton? If so, call 1800-xxx-xxxx Dorine

To: jim kelley who wrote (3557)	9/18/1998 11:46:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Morality (or lack thereof) is not what Clinton will be impeached for. JLA

To: jim kelley who wrote (3557)	9/18/1998 11:58:00 AM
From: j_b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Have you noticed that the Clinton haters on this thread do not wish to discuss the morality of people like Newt, Hyde, Burton, Chenowyth,...>> Those people are not having hearings held against them currently for impeachment. IF, after the current hearings are over, you want to impeach, them, they are fair game. What they may have done wrong has no bearing on Clinton or his current situation. <<What a bunch of hypocrites and liars these people are. Politics is a dirty cynical business for these people.>> Are you even suggesting that this problem is limited to Republicans? <<The Republicans are rushing to release the raw material of the grand jury proceeding despite the fact that grand jury proceeding are supposed to be secret.>> Two thirds of the Democrats in the House also voted to release the Grand Jury testimony. Why are you not including them in your diatribe?