SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ciena (CIEN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MangoBoy who wrote (3294)9/18/1998 1:40:00 PM
From: Tom Wilkes  Respond to of 12623
 
A regular Ciena search can be done at the Washington Post, which is following its troubles. Latest below:

Tom Wilkes

Ciena Suspects Sabotage of Merger
Md. Firm Says Rival May Have Used Questionable Methods
By Mike Mills
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 16, 1998; Page B11

Ciena Corp. said it was gathering evidence that an unnamed competitor engaged in "legally questionable" activities to scuttle the company's now-failed merger with Tellabs Inc. Some of that evidence includes an e-mail message that a Ciena document says was traced to arch-competitor Lucent Technologies Inc.

The Linthicum, Md.-based manufacturer of telecommunications equipment made the unusual allegations in a regular filing Monday with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In the filing, Ciena said it has been "accumulating evidence that a competitor may have engaged in targeted and legally questionable activities in order to undermine the Company's market position, as well as the proposed merger with Tellabs. The company has not yet reached any conclusions regarding this evidence, and is continuing to investigate."

The document continues: "The company believes the short-term impact of such tactics can be significant; in fact, the company believes at least some of the adversity it has recently encountered is a direct result of such tactics. There is no assurance that use of such tactics will cease."

Ciena also accused unnamed Wall Street traders of planting damaging news articles about the company in an effort to drive down its stock price. Ciena did not ask the SEC to take any action.

The Ciena and Tellabs merger was canceled Monday after a steady decline in Ciena's share price made it unlikely that shareholders would approve the deal. The decision capped a three-month ordeal for Ciena, which had announced in June that it would be acquired by Tellabs for $7 billion.

Ciena's SEC filing did not name the competitor or provide details on any of its allegations.

"We're investigating things at this point," said Ciena spokesman Denny Bilter. "We have not concluded anything officially."

But over the past two weeks, as Ciena struggled to salvage its merger with Tellabs, company officials privately speculated that Lucent, an equipment company spun off by AT&T Corp. two years ago and Ciena's chief competitor, played a role in the collapse of the deal.

Lucent officials have strongly denied any involvement in the collapse of the merger. AT&T officials declined to comment on grounds that they do not discuss relationships with suppliers.

The filing describes as "oddly timed" AT&T's Aug. 21 decision to drop Ciena as an equipment supplier. AT&T informed Ciena of its decision less than an hour before shareholders of both Ciena and Tellabs were set to approve the merger. Less than a week later, Tellabs demanded a lower price for Ciena and the deal was revalued at around $4 billion.

On Monday, as Ciena and Tellabs called off their merger, Ciena chief executive Patrick Nettles called AT&T's Aug. 21 phone call to him "a very peculiar coincidence," then added: "I don't believe in coincidences."

Sources said Ciena is investigating whether Lucent had any influence over AT&T's recent testing of Ciena products, which increase the transmission capacity of fiber-optics cables. AT&T leases laboratory facilities from Lucent in a building the two companies share in Holmdel, N.J.

Also among the evidence the company is analyzing is an anonymous e-mail message sent Aug. 28 to Tellabs public relations officer Thomas Scottino. It accuses Ciena of falsifying test results to indicate its equipment had complied with certain industry standards.

"I got it and I didn't know who it was from," Scottino said in an interview. "I forwarded it to our corporate counsel."

Ciena conducted an analysis in an effort to determine the message's origins and concluded that its sender had an Internet address registered to Lucent Technologies in Murray Hill, N.J., according to a copy of the analysis. "Ciena had it traced," Scottino said, though he said the results were not shared with Tellabs.

Bilter said Ciena could not comment on the e-mail message or any other potential evidence the company might be gathering.

Lucent officials did not return calls regarding the e-mail message.

c Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company

<Picture><Picture: Navigation Bar><Picture: Navigation Bar>
ÿ<Picture: Yellow Pages>
<Picture><Picture: American Intercontinental University><Picture: What you've been searching for - www.nlsearch.com>



To: MangoBoy who wrote (3294)9/18/1998 1:52:00 PM
From: Tom Wilkes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12623
 
All you fellow Ciena stockholders who want a little comic relief, read this, from Washington Post. Gets funny half way through. Anybody got AT&T service they want to dump? or an AT&T phone they want to return to the store? Try it. Maybe it will make you feel better.

Tom Wilkes

Md. Firm's Workers Grin and Bear It
By Mark Leibovich
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 15, 1998; Page C01

Their new BMWs and aging pickup trucks lined Route 176 yesterday like a lunchtime funeral procession. They were coming to mark the Death of a Deal.

Most of Ciena Corp.'s 1,500 employees convened at a Glen Burnie function hall at 1 p.m. for an all-hands meeting where chief executive Patrick H. Nettles formally told them the company's planned merger with Tellabs Inc. of Illinois was off. His words sparked a combination of sadness and relief that what they had long expected had finally come true.

When the deal was first announced on June 3, Tellabs agreed to pay $7 billion for Ciena, and many of the Linthicum firm's employee-owners stood to reap large portions of stock market wealth in the deal. But in recent weeks, as their company's stock price went into powered descent, they've learned the lesson that fortunes are lost as well as made in the new technology industry.

On June 3, Matt Rouiller's stake in the company was worth about $65,000, and the 25-year-old electronics technician was talking about putting the money toward buying his first house. Now, with the deal off and Ciena trading at just over $13, Rouiller's stock is worth about $10,000, he said.

Like many of his fellow Ciena workers, he said he's "thrilled" that the acquisition was finally terminated. Ciena is a place where people often feel loyalty and personal engagement. For one thing, the company has a stock ownership program for all employees.

Barbara Dulin, a 55-year-old technician in Ciena's customer service division, came to the meeting in her white lab coat and spoke with a reporter about the family atmosphere at the company.

She said she was upset that the Ciena name would have ceased to exist if the merger had gone through and applauded when Nettles announced it was off. "If we couldn't get a great price, we might as well still be Ciena," Dulin said. "Now we will be."

Until last month, Ciena was hailed as a trophy of the Washington area's technology boom. The four-year-old Linthicum firm makes advanced equipment that helps phone companies increase the capacity of their networks. Long-distance giants WorldCom Inc. and Sprint Corp. raved about its products.

After the June 3 merger announcement, some Ciena people spoke of cashing in their fattened stock options, buying new cars, taking dream vacations, maybe retiring early.

But as fast as the company soared, the deal fell apart, as AT&T Corp. announced that it wouldn't buy the company's equipment and competition heated up.

At the workplace, distractions mounted, frustration set in, purchases were postponed. Drops in the company's stock price led Tellabs to insist on marking the price it would pay down to about $4 billion. "It's been hard to concentrate recently," said Wayne Stanley, a technician in Ciena's engineering division.

Mixed in with the sadness and relief yesterday was some anger, directed mostly at AT&T, which Ciena officials say rejected their equipment on the day Ciena and Tellabs shareholders were to vote on the merger. Most Ciena employees believe that killed the deal.

When Nettles mentioned "our friends at AT&T," the ballroom erupted into boos and hisses. Throughout his half-hour presentation, Nettles rallied the ranks by invoking this common enemy. "We're going to get mad and get even," he said of AT&T. "We're going to supply the features they didn't want to their competition."

A group of employees seated under a gold chandelier broke into war whoops.

"We can live without them," Nettles continued. "There are many businesses who have done very well without a single nickel of revenue from AT&T."

Afterward, in an upstairs lounge, a group of Ciena employees were flaunting their anti-AT&T credentials. Stanley proudly told of how he had canceled his AT&T long-distance service last week. Kelly Prosise did, too.

Cheryl Sheckells, who works in the company's manufacturing office in Savage, said she returned her AT&T phone to the store.

"They are just idiots," Rouiller said about the timing of AT&T's notification that it wasn't interested in Ciena equipment. "What they did to us was totally uncalled for."

Outside, another engineer said he looked forward to a return to business as usual. "All the talk of deal-making and stock prices and getting rich never seemed real," said the engineer, who asked not to be identified because his boss had warned him not to speak to the press.

"In the end, this is my job and I try to do my best. The other stuff can drive you crazy if you let it."

c Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company



To: MangoBoy who wrote (3294)9/18/1998 2:21:00 PM
From: still learning  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12623
 
No. The press release makes it clear mgmt did not get repriced, and I'm sure ifthey were granted new shares it would be material enough to merit mention. Aside from that, it would not be a politically wise move. Instead, they come off as makingrank and file whole, while not getting any benefit themselves.