Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jim kelley who wrote (3593)	9/18/1998 1:57:00 PM
From: j_b	Respond to of 67261

<<I think that the issue of the sexual credentials of the Republicans who set themselves up to judge the Presidents sexual escapades and his attempt to keep them secret is substantive and bears on the fitness of those who presume to judge him.>> The President's sexual escapades are not being judged (I get a great picture of the Olympics judges holding up placards that show a 9.2 or whatever <g>). The cover up will not be judged by Hyde, Chenoweth, etc., but by the Senators. Notice that none of the slop has been thrown their way yet. The house can send up articles of impeachment, but they can not judge the merits of the case. Since this is true, the rest of your comments are irrelevant.

To: jim kelley who wrote (3593)	9/18/1998 1:59:00 PM
From: j_b	Respond to of 67261

<<Spoken like a true partisan. Of course it is relevant!>> I am a Libertarian, not a Republican. I have already gone on record here as saying I don't believe Clinton should be either impeached or otherwise removed from office. By attempting to smear me, and attacking me personally, you have shown what I don't like about this issue and the way it is being handled. I am absolutely not a partisan, and my approach to this issue has shown that. Can you say the same?