Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (13792)	9/18/1998 2:54:00 PM
From: J T	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

The offices that you have not been able to find are there. They are with Realty just DBA under what name they had before. If you would have taken the time to call the company Dave would have cleared it up for you.Or did you?And just wanted to what you do best,CAUSE PROBLEMS? What John put out was not in facts lies as you would have everyone believe,just getting ahead of himself. I have confidence in the company you don't,difference of opinions, you stated yours now give us a rest until the share holder meeting! jhild For someone that will not talk to the companies but will believe any PR put out and then attack the shareholders seems strange to me. The share holder meeting as I have been told will finally clear this all up. Oh jhild if this all turns out like us POOR MISGUIDED FOOL LONGS say it is, are you going to post as many time as you have to slam the company and APOLOGIZE! JT

To: jhild who wrote (13792)	9/18/1998 2:55:00 PM
From: Roger Bodine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

jhild, You are using words to enforce your negative perspective on this company that is not necessarily justified. This is also called misrepresentation. The same thing that you are accusing the company of doing. This is only your opinion and not necessarily the truth either. Opinions, attitudes can go either direction on any subject and be the 'truth' depending on one's viewpoint. Yes you do have some valid points and no you do not have some valid points. Many have asked the 'tough' questions. You are saying we have not? Be reasonable instead of a B52. Roger

To: jhild who wrote (13792)	9/18/1998 2:56:00 PM
From: John PD	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Jhild, Although I am no fan of yours,in the least bit, you do bring up some good points. At this time it could look as if they lied,but, they also may have been mislead,blindsided,spoke too soon out of excitement,or just victems of someone elses adgenda,etc...We just don't know yet. There is alot of misleading information coming from you and Lejag, not that SOME of your question aren't valid, it just seems as though they are trying to lead people into your adgenda( whatever that may be ). You have to admit, all the time you have spent on this board,and now RB, as a NON shareholder is VERY suspect. At least your information is misleading where LeJag's is usually outright lies. I don't want to engage in any kind of battle. I just really, really want to know why you are here? Please spare me the " to find the truth" bs. Why would you care about the truth of a company you don't own? On the other hand, we may have been scammed! I don't believe it and we shall find out soon enough. I PM Isoman last night expressing my apprehension about when you found the release, I have to say you haven't been as bad as usual( so far). Later, JohnPD