SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (15113)9/18/1998 6:01:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 120523
 
OT

Well Mary...it seems you and and Jeff have stirred up a little controversy....

so please be sure to cast your vote and make your voice heard

congratulations to all who made money this week..it was a tough week...

To: +dd (19278 )
From: +D.S.G.

Mary thinks there is too much salacious material out there.

Message 5786804

The offending picture:

members.wbs.net

Do you agree? Take the poll and give your views:

apps2.vantagenet.com



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (15113)9/18/1998 7:35:00 PM
From: Jeff Jordan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 120523
 
Jeff, >>>WARNING: if you are easily offended do not visit this link!!!!<<<

I am not one of his defenders - but the picture you are linking to is not only
offensive, but it was graphically altered to give a false picture.

We have enough salacious material as it is without you adding and entering fake
photographs to the situation.


Yes, and I was equally offended when the President of the United States shook his finger at us saying" I did not have sex with that woman! Monica Lewinsky". You tell me which is more offensive?

I did not alter that photograph....but someone did. As for the picture I've had in my profile for 6mos. and I really enjoyed the artists expression/and freedom of speech...I said "this is truly art"!