SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scrapps who wrote (6398)9/18/1998 3:18:00 PM
From: Jim S  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13994
 
Well, Scrapps, you're one up on me if you've seen anything resembling BDA photos of the Afghan site. I remember the excuse of cloud cover after the attack, but many days have passed since then. The only photos I remember seeing were pre-attack photos, and they were large scale photos, almost like maps.

I suspect that maybe we just made some expensive holes in the sand. The press silence on the subject has been deafening. I was willing to give Boy Clinton the benefit of the doubt for this attack, but that benefit is beginning to turn into just another reason to call him a damn liar.

jim



To: Scrapps who wrote (6398)9/18/1998 4:36:00 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 13994
 
That is strange. Reports were coming out of Afghanistan when they were fighting the USSR. The British have better reports on Sudan than we do but they have ties with the Sudanese and nothing to cover up.

In Somalia the troops could have landed on the piers but I think they used the landing as an exercise.