Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j_b who wrote (3667)	9/18/1998 4:48:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

>> Do we not have the right to see and hear that testimony and judge whether he was being truthful to us<< >>No. We are not in a legal position to judge or have any effect on Clinton's Presidency other than to be vocal. We have to trust the people we put in office to do what we hired them to do. That's the process - let it work.<< My question wasn't dealing with the "legality" of insisting upon the right as citizens to judge Clinton's veracity. This is now a political process. If Congress decides by a majority vote that it is in the best interest of the American people to see the evidence then that is exactly what should happen. You are making my point when you say you say "we should trust them to handle this in an appropriate fashion and to come to a just solution." That's exactly what is being done and part of that process was to evaluate the material and vote on it's release. If you disagree with their conclusions, you are entitled to that, but now the matter has been settled by the democratic process. We need to move on now to assimilating the evidence and drawing our conclusions. bp