SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VTEL: Anyone else follow this? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brad Bolen who wrote (1032)9/18/1998 9:29:00 PM
From: SR/WA  Respond to of 1214
 
Was I a little hasty N my previous comment??....Probably NOT.

I sold 1/2 my PO sition when it "rallied"???? to 4 1/4 couple weeks ago.
Am sick & tired of being sick & tired of holdin onto this SIC ol DOG.

News release after STUPID news release. The Street has been saying for years: "Its the EARNINGS.....STUPID".

Ken



To: Brad Bolen who wrote (1032)9/19/1998 3:39:00 PM
From: E_K_S  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1214
 
Rumor has it (from the YAHOO thread) that PLCM may have lost a lawsuit to VTEL or VTEL may have filed a lawsuit against PLCM.

From the PLCM YAHOO thread:

"...I follow V-tel and noticed an unusual reversal today. I then noticed that PLCM dropped hard. I tried to call PLCM headquarters and keep getting busy signals. So, just conjecture, but could PLCM have lost their longstanding lawsuit with V-tell? I can't come up with anything else to explain today..."

"...RE: Why the big run up yesterday if losing a lawsuit today

I don't know either. Maybe they thought they would win?
These are the guys that broke off from VTEL right?

All I know for sure is that was a mighty fall on 4 times the daily ave. vol. and investor relations was not answering. ..."

I believe some former VTEL engineers left VTEL to work at PLCM.

==================================================================

I am still quite frustrated with VTEL as PLCM has continued to sign new distribution and marketing agreements and VTEL has done nothing!

VTEL needs to focus on marketing and selling their products rather than fighting in the courts (if this is even true?).

EKS