Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Mongolia Gold Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (2666)	9/19/1998 12:00:00 PM
From: Dave R. Webb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4066

There is more long discussions where nothing seems to change than one can suspect. I've experienced it many times. Perhaps the difference here is that a third party has become involved. A banker, whose priority is not what had been discussed before, nor who's ego will get bruised. The banker wants his cash back. He can exert considerable pressure to resolve issues. Suddenly, the situation being discussed is not the same as the previous discussions. Sort of a challenge to the status quo (to paraphrase your old boss). In this light, maybe a solution is just a bit easier (or more necessary). The plus is, it can still be amicable (or at least presented as such). Business on the other side of the world is not too different than it is here.....it just seems to take a lot longer, because the quantum leaps that are possible here due to experience is not possible in Central Asia. You have to muddle through all the intermediate steps. In the end, you end up at the same conclusion. Dave

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (2666)	9/19/1998 7:33:00 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4066

Bob, eventho you hold no mgr, and hold reasons not to buy, I am very glad that you post on this thread. I can ask Dave the same question as you, but using different words, and Dave's reply to you will be different than his reply to me. Both of Dave's answers are true and sincere and valid, but each contains different facts and sometimes the same facts with a different perspective. Good for the thread, and sometimes Dave's reply can contain additional information in the "eyes" of the reader. For example, Dave's reply to your post left me with the feeling that progress has been made with the new element of the Bank entering as a factor. Meaning to me that the Bank has the ability to change talking-inaction to talking-action. I hope my guess is right, and if so then a period of time will be needed for the finally action phase to accomplish discussions and legal stuff. It may take days or weeks, and then it may require another trip to Mongolia for Dave so that all parties are finally willing to complete a deal. This is all speculation by me, and another trip by Dave may not be needed if he left enought information, and also, if Dave does go to Mongolia again soon, it may not signal a settlement is to happen. Doug