Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (29566)	9/20/1998 5:07:00 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33344

Scumbria, Nobody has the right to investigate anybody else's sex life I personally agree. But you should take this up with higher up in your party, who wrote the sexual harassment laws. If you are accused of sexual harassment, your sex life is a fair game. It is a very, very scary thing that this investigation has been allowed to stray so far. Monica Lewinsky has nothing to do with Vince Foster, or Whitewater. Come on. You know exactly what Monica Lewinsky has to do with Whitewater, and why Janet Reno extended the Ken Starr's juristiction. Ken Star presented her evidence of witness tampering and obstruction of justice that fits the pattern and is a continuation of Whitewater, TravelGate and FileGate. The same pattern. The same lies. The same "memory lapses". The same cast of characters. The same efforts to silence people from telling the truth. The main difference is that Monica Lewinsky decided to stop lying on behalf of the president. It is also telling that the only honest person in this White House is an intern. Joe PS: according to some conspiracy theories, Monica Lewinsky has more direct evidence of obstruction of justice. But she not made it public for her own protection. There may be something to it, since Clinton so far hasn't sent his attack dogs (paid by our tax money) to destroy her.