Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Gold who wrote (6215)	9/19/1998 1:23:00 PM
From: J. Nelson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Ok, Money man...When was the 38 meter hole sunk? By who, why just one hole? Why was it 38 meters is that not a distance for a plasser and the new one of 700 meters would be for a hard rock location...?... What are they going so deep for on one hole? Just to chance the span between the two sights? If at 600 meters they went into good gold producing earth that should require a topoff of millions of tonns of earth to get there. What would that do for the cost? That's why I'm starting to wonder if there is good reason for a 700 meter drop. Why not 200 followed by 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, and space the holes out say 25 meters. That would be bankable. To make it bankable at 700 meters they would have to drill a hole every 25 meters down to mineralization say 450 ot 500 meters that would cost big bucks.... Whacha think???