SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should Clinton resign? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (445)9/19/1998 5:34:00 PM
From: mrknowitall  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 567
 
Dan - I think the topic is "Should Clinton resign," and from your post one might infer that:

1) A drunk driver (person A) causes an accident which results in the death of someone, but he drives away and is not caught. A witness can point to Person A being in the city at that time, but no substantive evidence points to on party and therefore, no one is charged or prosecuted.
2) Years and years later, Person B is pulled over for a traffic violation, fails the field sobriety test, and is charged with DWI.

From your apparent point of view:

At trial, Person B's defense is that because person A never was caught or prosecuted, he cannot be held accountable.

You state "you don't follow this stuff closely." Given the depth of detail in your posts, There are two possibilities: You are being disingenous about your own knowledge and its sources, or you are in fact, not following this kind of stuff from any perspective but the White House and Democratic spin machines.

Mr. K.




To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (445)9/19/1998 7:39:00 PM
From: DD™  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 567
 
Morton M. Kondracke: THANKS TO SLICK, "DEMS FACE ELECTORAL DEVASTATION THIS FALL"

rollcall.com

DD