SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton -- doomed & wagging, Japan collapses, Y2K bug, etc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KIWI who wrote (394)9/20/1998 11:20:00 AM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
Dear KIWI,

I try to post current events so that those who are intelligent, yet not right with God, will begin to see the unmistakable pattern of Biblical prophecy coming true before their very eyes. Once they see this is true, then perhaps they will seek out the Truth concerning eternity and where they will be spending it.

If I have given a message of fear, then that was not my intent -- at least not for those whose hearts are right. I am not fearful of the future, even though I know that there will be some very tough times ahead -- unless the Rapture occurs before everything.

Further, I don't think it is right for people to simply "hoard up" and prepare to "save" themselves. There is nothing wrong with preparing to survive if the intent is to help others who have not prepared. If we are here, this will be the most opportune time in history in which to supply the physical needs of others and point them to Jesus.

Some christian missionaries in 3rd world countries have no electricity, running water, etc., yet they continue to choose to live in these conditions to help others. Perhaps those of us who been fortunate to not have to live like this will get a chance to experience a new kind of faith. We should not be fearful of this challenge. The things that we are going to see unfold in the coming years (and perhaps even the coming months) have been ordained from the beginning.

Your point about the pope is very interesting. This cancelling of debt makes perfect sense as a part of an overall plan to get the world on one currency and bring about "world peace" -- One Government, One Religion, One Currency -- it is exactly what the Bible says will happen.

I will continue to post the reality of what is happening, and it should strike FEAR in the hearts of those who don't know that their eternity is secure. If just ONE person gets right by reading this thread, then it will have been worthwhile.

I remain,

SOROS




To: KIWI who wrote (394)9/20/1998 11:21:00 AM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
The Telegraph - London - 09/20/98

By Julian West in Islamabad

THE nuclear arms race between India and Pakistan appears to have entered a more deadly phase. On the eve of talks between President Clinton and Pakistan's Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, over the country's nuclear programme, secret reports suggest that both countries are set to test more missiles and that Pakistan has
received shipments of weapons material from North Korea.

Intelligence reports circulated to senior officials in the Clinton administration show that the deliveries of warhead canisters were made to Pakistan's nuclear establishment, the Khan Research Laboratories, one month after its nuclear tests in May.

According to the reports, aircraft containing the canisters and components for missile production were spotted in Pakistan. Satellite spy photographs also disclosed increased activity at the Khan Laboratories' missile production and assembly plant, suggesting that Pakistan has stepped up production of its nuclear-capable Ghauri missile.

An independent military analyst in Islamabad, Shireen Mazari, said last week that Pakistan was "well into production of the Ghauri". She said Pakistan also had a number of reactors capable of producing
highly-enriched uranium for nuclear weapons. A Chinese-built reactor, capable of producing weapons-grade plutonium, has been completed recently, although it is not believed to be operational yet.

The continuing military co-operation between Pakistan and North Korea, which is considered one of the world's most dangerous and unstable nations, is of grave concern to Washington. Only last month North Korea fired what was thought at first to be a missile but turned out to be failed satellite launch. Unlike India, which has
developed its own nuclear and missile programmes with initial help only from Russia, Pakistan has long relied on technical assistance and components smuggled in from companies in the United States and Europe. With the break-down of the Soviet Union and the dire economic conditions in North Korea, it now appears that Pakistan is receiving most of its supplies from those two regions.

A further US intelligence report discloses that Pakistan received recently a shipment of Russian weapons-grade steel, believed to be for its missile programme, from a North Korean company, the Changowang Sinyong Corporation, also known as the North Korea Mining Development Trading Corporation.

Pakistan is also believed to be negotiating supplies of mass spectrometers, lasers and carbon fibre, used in missile guidance systems, from Russian manufacturers, via a Pakistani trading company with long-standing interests in the former Soviet Union.

While Pakistan presses ahead with production of its Ghauri missile, India, which tested nuclear weapons shortly before Pakistan, in May, is also forging ahead with its nuclear development programme with a series of
missile tests. Two weeks ago, India conducted tests of its Akash and Trishul surface-to-air anti-aircraft missiles. It has said that it will soon be ready to test the Agni II, a longer range version of the Agni I, both of which are intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads.

A naval version of the medium-range 150km - 250km surface-to-surface Prithvi I and II, designed to be launched from a submarine and, like the earlier Prithvis, nuclear-capable, is also due to be tested soon.

The news that India and Pakistan are developing missile delivery systems for their nuclear weapons, following the escalation of tensions in Kashmir, alarms the West. India and Pakistan have fought two of their three wars over Kashmir, which is now considered to be one of the world's most likely nuclear flashpoints. Analysts also
fear that India might be racing to develop its expensive nuclear programme - which requires sophisticated command and control systems - at the expense of its conventional arms programme.

A Western defence analyst said: "If all funds are siphoned into this programme, weakening conventional capabilities and leaving only the nuclear option, you have a very dangerous situation. The international
community is extremely worried by that scenario."

America, which has termed possible nuclear war in the sub-continent as "catastrophic, not only in terms of loss of life but in its potential to lower the threshold of nuclear use in other parts of the world", is pressing India and Pakistan to sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.



To: KIWI who wrote (394)9/20/1998 11:24:00 AM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
New York Times - 09/20/98

By CELESTINE BOHLEN

OSCOW -- President Boris Yeltsin made a rare appearance in public last Wednesday evening at a gala concert at Moscow's Conservatory. At least, he was there for the start of a performance by the Russian cellist Mstislav Rostropovich and Seiji Ozawa, the Boston Symphony's conductor.

By intermission, he was gone.

As Russia's new prime minister, Yevgeny Primakov, struggled to patch together a coalition Cabinet last week, Yeltsin's involvement in the affairs of his crisis-ridden country has provided the background noise, audible enough but increasingly distant.

In an eerie sequence reminiscent of the stylized protocol of Soviet times, television news broadcasts show him in his Kremlin office, ushering a visitor to a table where the cameras silently track opening remarks. The next news item shows an identical scene, with a different guest. The images only support the growing impression that Russia's once powerful president, weakened by crisis and poor health, has been sidelined to a largely ceremonial role.

News agencies report his telephone conversations with world leaders, and his decrees on ministerial appointments. But Primakov, the artful diplomat, is clearly making the choices that will define Russia's future course, as he sifts through opposing political factions in the difficult search for consensus.

How Yeltsin will figure into that consensus is no longer relevant: His views on Russia's economic policies have been washed over by events that have left him isolated, and humbled.

For the first time in a career that capitalized on conflicts, Yeltsin backed away from a certain showdown with the parliamentary opposition over the nomination of Viktor Chernomyrdin as prime minister. In Russia's play-for-keeps politics, a compromise -- in this case, the nomination of Primakov -- carries with it the faint aroma of defeat.

"Today, very little remains of President Yeltsin's clout," wrote Natalia Konstantinova in the newspaper Independent last week. Even Boris Berezovsky, the Russian tycoon and master intriguer said to have close ties to the president's family, told British television last week that Yeltsin's time had run out.

Instead of statements of policy, or words of reassurance, the Kremlin has been the source of tales of shadowy intrigue and petty power plays in the last week.

Soon after Primakov's nomination was confirmed, two top Kremlin aides -- Andrei Kokoshin, secretary of the National Security Council, and Sergei Yastrzhembsky, Yeltsin's top press spokesman -- were summarily
dismissed, reportedly for disloyalty to the president.

Neither has been available to provide his version of events, but according to press reports, and people who know the details, their transgressions consisted of going directly to Yeltsin with unsolicited advice on how to get Parliament to confirm a new prime minister.

They reportedly argued that the situation was too volatile to contain a conflict between the president and the Parliament, and urged Yeltsin to drop Chernomyrdin for a compromise candidate. According to one version, they pushed the candidacy of Moscow's mayor, Yuri Luzhkov; according to another, they were advocating anyone but Chernomyrdin.

By picking Primakov, Yeltsin would seem to have heeded their advice.

"It is a paradox, but it is in the tradition of Russian paradoxes," said Pavel Voshchanov, a journalist who is also one of Yeltsin's former press secretaries. "When servants come to their master with unwelcome advice with which he is obliged to agree, he accepts it grudgingly, and resentfully."

Although the dismissal of the two highly respected advisers was undoubtedly ordered by Yeltsin, it was pushed by his chief of staff, Valentin Yumashev, a former journalist who became Yeltsin's top aide and chief gatekeeper after he helped write Yeltsin's book, "The Struggle for Russia."

According to press reports, Yumashev and his close ally, Yeltsin's daughter and adviser Tatyana Dyachenko, 38, had pressed the president to stand firm against the Parliament. In the end, they were overruled, but eventually took their revenge.

Kokoshin and Yastrzhembsky had acted without informing Yumashev, who then preferred to insist on their dismissal "rather than undermine his power and ability to control the president," said Vyacheslav Nikonov,
director of the Politica Fund, a Moscow research organization.

Their departure has depleted Yeltsin's already dwindling circle of close advisers. His team of young free-market reformers -- figures like Anatoly Chubais, the architect of Russia's privatization, and former Prime Minister Sergei Kiriyenko, who used to huddle under his long political shadow -- have been dispersed, unlikely to return.
His old allies from Russia's democratic movement now lack a leader, or even a credible heir.

Even Chernomyrdin, the yo-yo of Russian politics for his ability to rebound in difficulty, has been left stranded,
with little hope of another reincarnation.

Yumashev, 40, who began his career editing letters to the popular weekly Ogonyok, has neither the skills nor the authority to fill the widening gap left around Yeltsin, observers say.

"I saw him at a number of meetings during the 1996 campaign, and afterward, and I don't remember him ever saying a word," Nikonov said. His former newspaper colleagues remember Yumashev as an unimpressive,
scruffy figure whose power lies in his total loyalty to the president.

Sensing Yeltsin's weakness, the leftist opposition continues to press its advantage. An impeachment process is still wending its way to the floor of the Parliament, even though its chances of clearing the constitutional hurdles remain slight. More realistically, a series of legal changes to the constitution would reduce the powers of the presidency. These have already been drafted and are also making their way through the opposition-dominated Parliament.

In tracking the decline of Yeltsin's influence, many look to Berezovsky, seeing in him a political bellwether whose main loyalty is to power, no matter who holds it. In his interview with the BBC, Berezovsky was asked if Yeltsin should resign. "I think yes," he replied. "Of course, that depends on what the alternative would be, but I think we have an alternative better than him."

Typically, he gave no clues on whom he had in mind.

Yeltsin's health is another handicap, although no one knows for sure what ails him, other than the aftereffects of his 1996 quintuple bypass heart surgery and a history of heavy drinking. He has his good days when his step is firm and his gaze focused. But he also has his bad days, when his attention drifts and his off-the-cuff remarks
have to be interpreted by aides. Whatever the nature of his medical problem, both he and his staff seem leery of his being before the public for long periods.

And yet, in these past hectic weeks, Yeltsin has surprised his harshest detractors by proving that he can still make decisions, and even impromptu appearances. On Thursday, he paid a 15-minute visit to a Moscow grocery store, although no reporters or television crews were present to record the scene.

Several analysts still caution against ruling him out of the picture entirely, noting that as long as he still has power he will try to wield it, if for no other reason than to insure his survival in office.

Yeltsin's retirement before the end of his term in 2000, followed by early presidential elections, is a recurrent theme among Moscow's political elite. Few who know the president expect him to leave office of his own free will.

"I would give anything for Boris Nikolayevich to quit -- I would promise him anything he wants," Pyotr Sumin, the governor of the Chelyabinsk region, told the Russian magazine Profil. "We could live without him. But he will not quit."



To: KIWI who wrote (394)9/20/1998 11:29:00 AM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
NOTE: Especially note the part about his wife's son -- seems like the leaders everywhere have slipped even lower -- even those that were corrupt already. Although, you can;t go any lower than the partial birth abortion, and that's where many of America's leaders are.

The Telegraph - 09/20/98

THE man who masterminded Saddam Hussein's arms-for-oil sanctions-busting has escaped to the West in the most spectacular defection of the dictator's 20-year tyranny.

Sami Salih has provided details of Saddam Hussein's illegal oil smuggling network and how the profits were used to buy arms to prop up his corrupt regime. Salih, who is regarded as the most important defector to emerge from Iraq since Saddam seized power, set up a network of front companies in the Middle East and Europe to handle the trade. Profits from the transactions were used to finance Saddam's regime and the illegal purchase of arms, supplies and equipment for the Iraqi armed forces.

Salih, 38, defected to Britain with his wife and four children earlier this year after he was accused of spying by Saddam and arrested. After being tortured by Saddam's guards, he escaped from prison. He and his family are now in hiding in Belgium. Salih has given a detailed account of his activities to American and British
intelligence officials, who have now taken action to close down Saddam's international smuggling network.

A senior United Nations official in New York said last week: "The information provided by Salih is gold dust. He has given us sufficient information to take effective action against Iraq's various attempts to evade sanctions."

The exhaustive detail provided by Salih will undoubtedly strengthen the determination of British and American diplomats to ensure that United Nations sanctions against Iraq are rigorously enforced. Salih, who spent most of his time working inside Saddam's presidential palace headquarters in Baghdad, has also provided a chilling insight into the corruption and depravity that epitomises the regime's daily routine.

Apart from the institutionalised violence, Salih also claims to have evidence that Saddam's moral degeneracy has reached the point where he recently seduced the son of his latest wife, Samira Shabandar, whom he
married after separating from his first wife, Sajidah, in 1994.

One of the more remarkable aspects of the oil smuggling operation disclosed by Salih is that it involved close co-operation between Iran and Iraq. Officially the two countries are sworn enemies, and fought an eight-year war in the Eighties in which more than one million people died. But the Iranians agreed to help Iraq to avoid international sanctions by shipping oil cargoes through Iranian territorial waters, where they could move unimpeded by the attentions of British and American warships patrolling the Gulf.

In return, the Iranians took a healthy cut of Iraq's black market profits. Iraq is expected to renew its campaign for sanctions to be lifted at the UN General Assembly, which starts in New York tomorrow.

Under the terms of the deal negotiated with the UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan, during last February's crisis, which was prompted by Iraq's refusal to co-operate with UN weapons inspectors, the UN was to consider lifting sanctions in return for Iraq's co-operation with dismantling weapons of mass destruction. Mr Annan is now reported to be furious with Saddam for reneging on the undertakings he gave to avoid military action.

UN weapons inspectors withdrew from Iraq last month, claiming that they were unable to fulfil their mandate because of Iraq's obstruction. The UN retaliated by passing a resolution which suspended sanctions reviews until further notice in an effort to urge Iraq to resume co-operation.



To: KIWI who wrote (394)9/20/1998 11:32:00 AM
From: SOROS  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 1151
 
BBC - London - 09/20/1998

The new PM meets IMF officials - but where is their money going?

Jonathan Charles in Moscow reports on evidence that millions of dollars provided as aid to Russia is being squandered:

Venyamin Sokolov is an unlikely crusader - but Russia's chief auditor has spent the past few months travelling across the country to track down billions of dollars of missing aid from the West.

Mr Sokolov does not look like a trouble maker but this short, greying man in his late fifties has been stirring up problems for the new Russian government.

When we met in Moscow this week, Mr Sokolov came armed with a briefcase full of evidence detailing corruption and incompetence.

He told me that he has uncovered proof that billions sent by the west to help his country's economy have been wasted.

Mr Sokolov, who is director of Russia's chamber of accounts, says that some of the money was lost to corruption and much of the rest was used improperly.

His comments come as the International Monetary Fund is considering whether to loan Russia another œ3bn in the wake of the latest economic turmoil there.

Vanishing money

As we drove around Moscow in his car, Mr Sokolov pointed out building after building where officials had colluded with corruption.

Passing the finance ministry he said it had been given œ100m to fund an export contract for MIG jet aircraft - but during his investigations he had discovered that the deal was bogus and the money had vanished.

Mr Sokolov claims it is just a tiny fraction of the total amount which has gone missing because of corrupt officials and business executives.

He says: "Because we are talking about huge sums of money, naturally we can't check everything."

"We have checked a fair proportion of the loans and I am ashamed to say that several billion dollars has not been used for its intended purpose - and some of it was simply stolen."

Warning to IMF

Mr Sokolov says that he gave a warning to the IMF months ago that the loans were being abused. He is urging the West not to send any more money until proper supervisory measures are put into place to prevent it being wasted.

"First and foremost we have to establish strict financial controls - the kind that exist in any country in Western Europe ... it's a basic prerequisite for the development of market economics, in order to create a highly effective economy and to overcome corruption."

The Russian government is trying to negotiate fresh loans to help it stabilise the economy. The money is needed to prop up the rouble and to help pay for imports.

Forty percent of Russia's food is imported, and without hard currency it may face shortages this winter.

As I wandered around supermarkets in Moscow this week, the crisis was clearly beginning to bite.

Because food is no longer being imported, the prices of everything produced domestically is rocketing.

Meat and sugar have tripled in cost since the economic collapse started in the middle of August.

As I watched, pensioners with just a few roubles shook their heads sorrowfully at the food which is now just too expensive for them to buy.

The government says the West's help is urgently required. But the evidence presented by Mr Sokolov is unlikely to convince the IMF that any new loans should be agreed.