SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Winstar Comm. (WCII) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TheSlowLane who wrote (8309)9/20/1998 12:16:00 PM
From: Mazman  Respond to of 12468
 
Two articles related to wireless in Monday's IBD.

First article ..
Wireless Networks Connect with More Businesses, Uses
Investor's Business Daily -- 9/21/98
by Michele Hostetler

Some drivers don't have to stop when crossing the U.S. border near San Diego, thanks to wireless technology.

Many of the 600 cars per hour that pass through the San Clemente Checkpoint have a bar code affixed to them that approves them for border crossing. A scanner reads the code and sends a radio signal to a database 400 feet away.

The database instantly makes a match, so the vehicle can continue without stopping. If the database doesn't get a match, a red light flashes and the car is stopped for inspection.

This is an example of a wireless network. Customs officials wanted to go wireless because they didn't want to string cable across one of the nation's most-traveled freeways , says Luis Amavizca, checkpoint watch commander.

And officials needed some system to speed the increasing load of traffic at the busy border. The system saves Customs a ton of manpower, time and money, Amavizca says.

Wireless networks long have had promise. But high prices and slow speeds hindered adoption.

That's changing. Standards have been hammered out, making it easier for companies to make products that work with others. And faster transmission speeds are in the offing.

''I think that '98 and '99 will be years when a lot happens, but the market won't take off quickly,'' said Fran Firth, an analyst at the Scottsdale, Ariz.-based Cahners In-Stat Group. ''2000 and beyond is where we'll see the real serious growth.''

Wireless network sales worldwide will reach nearly $400 million this year and jump to $1.23 billion by '01, she says. That's up from $286 million last year.

A trade group this month revealed the results of its first study to gauge how companies are using, and benefiting from, the technology. The Redwood City, Calif., group is the Wireless LAN (local-area network) Alliance. Members include 3Com Corp., Proxim Inc. and Lucent Technologies Inc.

The study looked at 34 companies, representing about 10,000 users of wireless networks.

Results found education and health care as the leading industry groups that use wireless networks. Of the 34 companies found to be most using wireless networks, education and health care each account for 23%.

Wireless LANs also are used in inventory control. For example, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. will scan inventory into its database by using wireless products.

Retail, which only accounted for 15% of the users, had the biggest return on investment, says Mack Sullivan, alliance director. Retail companies spent $4.2 million on wireless networks and received $5.6 million in benefits, such as increased productivity and saved money. It took retailers 9.7 months to recoup the money spent on the wireless LAN, he says.

Office automation had the quickest payback - 6.3 months to pay for a system that costs $1.3 million and gives $2.5 million in benefits, the study says.

The results were better than the alliance expected. ''We were anticipating more like a year to two years before payback,'' Sullivan said.


One reason for the better-than-expected results is that costs are dropping, Firth says. Prices for ''chip cards'' - credit-card-sized circuit boards inserted in computers to connect to wireless nets - have fallen to about $200, from $800 three years ago, she says.

And the price could fall to $100 in the next year, Firth says.

That's getting close to wireline prices. ''Chip cards,'' or network interface cards, for Ethernet networks, the most common wireline network type, sell for about $80.

Price is critical. ''The cost justification may get much easier in the future,'' Sullivan says.

Speed is another issue. Wireless networks move data at one to two megabits a second, compared to basic Ethernet's rate of 10 megabits.

''The marketplace requires speed,'' Firth said. ''If you tell someone you can have wireless technology but not at the Ethernet speeds you're used to, then where's the value?''

But wireless makers are shifting into a higher gear. Wireless could move at 10 to 11 megabits in the next 18 months, Firth says.

''It's to the point where people will actually consider wireless,'' Firth said. ''It makes sense in lots of different environments.''


Small and home offices will be more attracted to wireless LANs, she says. One benefit is that when such offices relocate, the wireless gear can easily be moved. That's not so with wired infrastructure, she says.

Greater use of mobile computing also could spur wireless. Laptop computers, hand-helds and cellular phones have electronic-mail capabilities. New products being developed for mobile devices will make it easier to use them in networks. With a wireless net, for example, users could update an e-mail address on one of their
laptops and have that update sent to all of their other mobile devices.

Converging voice and data networks also could boost wireless, Sullivan says. In the wired world, voice and data could run over a single wired network in the next several years.

The same thing could happen between wireless telephone systems and wireless LANs, Sullivan says. One wireless network could transport voice and data, resulting in cost savings, he says.



To: TheSlowLane who wrote (8309)9/20/1998 12:22:00 PM
From: Mazman  Respond to of 12468
 
Two articles related to wireless in Monday's IBD.

Second article ..

BellSouth Ready For Life After Phone Deregulation
Investor's Business Daily -- 9/21/98
by Reinhardt Krause

Why are shares of BellSouth Corp. trading at a premium compared with those of the other regional Bells?

How's this for starters: BellSouth's a candidate for a merger, its cellular business is expanding fast overseas and its earnings growth stands out among the Baby Bells.

All three reasons - and several others -help explain why BellSouth's shares are 30% to 35% above those of other local phone companies, say industry analysts.

That's despite the fact that BellSouth is dealing with the same regulatory mandate as all the other regional Bells. Its core business in nine states is expected to erode as local phone markets are opened up to rivals under the 1996 Telecommunications Act.

''As we see more competitive impact in our local business, we're delivering growth from other investments,'' said Ronald Dykes, BellSouth's chief financial officer.

Atlanta-based BellSouth's net income rose 13% to $1.6 billion in the first half of '98, up from $1.4 billion a year earlier.

Cellular revenue overseas is a big factor in Bell South's success, Dykes says. Overseas cellular investments rose 54% to $901 million in the first half of '98, up from $584 million for the same period in '97. Those sales include Germany, Denmark and Israel. BellSouth has signed a deal to sell its cellular business in New Zealand.

BellSouth also is taking a cue from its own name and heading toward the equator to grow its wireless business, analysts say. While the Far East's economic woes are causing concern in other emerging markets, there's plenty of pent-up demand for phone service in Latin America, the company says. BellSouth's cellular revenue there has soared 79% to $585 million for '98's first half, up from $327.5 million in '97.

''There's limited capital risk, and the growth rates are phenomenal,'' said John Sini, financial analyst at Merrill Lynch & Co. in New York.

BellSouth's wireless holdings include ventures in Argentina, Chile and Venezuela. Last year, it placed a big bet on Brazil. BellSouth led a consortium that bid $2.5 billion for a wireless license in Sao Paulo, Brazil, the country's biggest market, with 18 million people.

Early results look encouraging, analysts say. BellSouth started service in Brazil in mid-May, with a waiting list of 2 million subscribers. It had 535,000 in service at the end of August, Dykes says.

While the wireless market overseas looks promising, BellSouth's cellular business in the U.S. is under pressure. In the first half of '98, BellSouth's U.S. cellular sales grew to $1.3 billion, up only 5.3% from $1.2 billion a year earlier. New players are trying to
grab market share, driving down monthly rates.

BellSouth plans to build new domestic data networks, which are used for both voice and Internet traffic. Two other Bells, US West Inc. and Bell Atlantic Corp., have grabbed the limelight in targeting data services.

BellSouth will disclose more of its data strategy at a meeting with financial analysts in New York in early October, Dykes says.

''Nobody would have a more complete set of data assets - switches and fiber - than we do,'' he said. ''Our digital services business is growing at about 45%.''

Data revenues jumped to $432 million in the second quarter ended June 30, up from $300 million a year earlier, BellSouth says.

Most of BellSouth's capital investments are going into building up data links between cities in its region. But it also may partner with a company operating a national data network, Dykes says.

''We have an interest in data assets that we don't have today. (We'll) acquire, build or somehow access those assets to fulfill our customer expectations,'' Dykes said.

A bigger network would come in handy when BellSouth can offer long-distance service.

Like the other Bells, though, it's still waiting for a green light from the Federal Communications Commission. To gain approval, the Bells must show they've taken concrete steps to create competition in local phone markets.

For new entrants, BellSouth's most attractive markets to attack are high-density cities like Miami and Atlanta. Rivals tend to target small and midsize businesses first.

On the other hand, BellSouth can recoup revenue by getting into long-distance. It may be able to use its brand name to package wireless, long-distance and Internet services, analysts say.

The FCC turned down BellSouth's first application to offer long-distance in Louisiana last year. But Dykes says BellSouth will try again soon, most likely seeking approval for a big state like Georgia.

While Bell Atlantic Corp. and SBC Communications Inc. are forging ahead with mergers, BellSouth is taking care of business solo - for now.

Bell Atlantic acquired Nynex Corp. last year. In July, it announced a merger with GTE Corp. SBC snapped up Pacific Bell in '97. It announced a $57 billion deal to buy Ameritech in May.

Dykes claims any merger is unlikely until BellSouth gets into long-distance service. Industry developments, though, could change BellSouth's mind.

One of its main rivals in the South is Tampa, Fla.-based Intermedia Communications Inc., which could be acquired by a bigger phone company. An Intermedia-Bell Atlantic alliance is one scenario, analysts say.

But BellSouth is unlikely to make a hasty move, says Jeffrey Kagan, president of consultancy Kagan Associates Inc. in Atlanta.

''They won't be pressured into a merger or acquisition,'' he said. ''They're going to wait until there's an offer that's just too good to pass up for shareholders.''

When BellSouth is ready, Sprint Corp. looms as a possible merger partner, analysts say. Sprint combines a local phone business and long-distance service.

''They (BellSouth)) can remain independent for some time longer,'' said Boyd Peterson, analyst at market researcher Yankee Group in Boston, Mass. ''To the extent their cost structure (managing a network) can be improved through a merger or acquisition, I think they'll look at it.''



To: TheSlowLane who wrote (8309)9/21/1998 8:46:00 AM
From: Alejandro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12468
 
Paul:
<<What makes you so sure that this latest round of acquisitions is a departure from the game plan? Did you get a copy of Coach Bill's playbook? >>

No, no play book. Just thought focus was on ramping up and not acquiring. Although I never thought acquiring was out of the question, it is more than I expected. ARTT was a good example. I re-read the Friday announcement and it does say more are in the pipeline. Goodnet and Midcom were good fire sale buys. ARTT will be also if we get the rest of it.

No, my concern is the paying for, managing and incorporating these new ISP's. Like you said though, they are small.

Steve:
I was referring mostly to the doubts about Jan 40's.

ac