SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (3939)9/20/1998 11:22:00 AM
From: tyro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
The Starr report: 'pornography for puritans'.

The tart Lewinski represents a new low in chutzpah. Why no thread to pillory her? If I were the king in an absolutist Catholic monarchy and a scandal of this tawdry magnitude befell one of my ministers, I would force the creature responsible to enter a convent. No book deals.



To: Bill who wrote (3939)9/20/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: Dorine Essey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Actually Bill,
This is why. I went to send a message to Our President not to resign and I put in whitehouse.com instead of whitehouse.gov

I couldn't believe my eyes. What a sordid mess this has turned out to become .
Now the PORN folks will believe they have a right to print in the web anything they want. How sick.

Dorine



To: Bill who wrote (3939)9/20/1998 12:17:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Bill: To be totally honest, I don't necessarily disagree with your position 100% percent. However, if it was not the "salacious detail" defense there would be some other equally vacuous defense. I see no one in Clinton's camp refuting the alleged facts. JLA


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News