Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should Clinton resign? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (461)	9/20/1998 12:18:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 567

Oh, right. My partisanship knows no bounds. How about yours? How about Newt, or Hyde, or Delay? Bush and Thomas didn't lie under oath? Bush really was "out of the loop" on Iran/Contra? Thomas really never, ever gave a thought to Roe V. Wade? I'm misinformed? Maybe you could point me to a better source of information. Rush Limbaugh perhaps? Once again, someone's got to explain to me how the Starr proceedings are supposed to be non-partisan and objective, and the Clinton defense is uniquely partisan in this context. And how pointing out the hypocrisy of Newt and Hyde on these matters is all smears and innuendo, but the whole Clinton hating "Who killed Vince Foster" / Waco Wacko / Whitewater campaign is some objective search for truth and justice. I'm partisan? The White House is partisan? Who, exactly, is nonpartisan in this mess? Eagerly awaiting your polite and informative answer to that last one. Cheers, Dan.