Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should Clinton resign? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (464)	9/20/1998 12:41:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 567

When it comes to impeachment, we should all step back and seriously measure the gravity of the procedure. It takes putting partisanship aside to do this. Right. So, you're telling me that Newt and Henry Hyde are putting partisanship aside here. I think you're a loon. Who, exactly, in the Republican leadership can you point to as non-partisan in this case? As to spewing hatred, that's another one. I'm spewing hatred. The Rush/Waco/"Christian Nation" crowd, on the other hand, is full of Christian love and forbearance, and objectively searching for truth and justice.. More hypocrisy. You can preach about the gravity of the procedure all you want., and talk about partisan hatred on the other side. Maybe it makes you feel all good and moral and honorable. I'd say you're a hypocrite too. You seem to claim that "partisan hatred" is a unique characteristic of Clinton and his backers, and the other side is somehow different. When I compare Clinton to Newt, I see a much longer history of smear and innuendo on one side than the other. Politics is a blood sport these days. Once more, a question you seem to not have an answer for. Can you point to someone in the Republican leadership I should look to that's putting partisanship aside here? Pretty please?