Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (12657)	9/20/1998 4:08:00 PM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71178

Freddy- don't go getting all temperamental on me. I don't know who did what to whom-I'm not talking party stuff here. The question is on what legal grounds did Starr release grand jury testimony which is supposed to be highly confidential. if it went to impeachment, or trial, then it makes sense. I asked Dan and he said that he didn't understand it and had read nothing that justified it, and that Grand Jury testimony was one of the most strictly held confidential hearings. Apparently DSD thinks so. too. Why do you take this as a defense of Clinton? You're begging the question. It's not like you to be illogical!