Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (4006)	9/20/1998 5:45:00 PM
From: Who, me?	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Michelle, there's just a couple of things I need to add to the things I told you about my experiences. 1) I was a Democrat all my life...voted for Jimmy Carter twice! I was a Democrat because my family was! I did not really know why! 2) My daughter got a wonderful education and is a fabulous wife and mother. She is a "stay home" Mom - by choice! 3) My daughter finally convinced me to take my mind off work long enough to look at Ronald Reagan's Presidency! I voted for him the second time and have voted Republican ever since. I changed my registration when the Democrats nominated Bill Clinton. I knew it was time for me to go!!! 4) I'm thankful I have a daughter that loves me! Just wanted to share this with you....

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (4006)	9/20/1998 6:00:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

With the possible exception of reversing the ban on partial birth abortions, exactly what piece of "social engineering" legislation have the Republicans put forth? BTW, it would be helpful if you define your terms. All laws which are enacted could be construed as "social engineering". The Dems have by far the worst record in passing legislation geared toward the redistribution of wealth in this country, remember LBJ's "Great Society"? "Social engineering" in it's most despicable form, imo. Would you consider for example granting education vouchers for individuals "social engineering?" bp

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (4006)	9/20/1998 8:31:00 PM
From: Earl Risch	Respond to of 67261

Michelle. It appears to me that you see at least some of the harm the "social engineering" has caused. Still, almost every time Clinton opens his mouth, it is to further his ideas of what is good for us, more social engineering. IMO the repubs have been slightly better, by slowing down the growth of government programs, and I have often voted for them as the lesser of two evils. It is frustrating to stand on the sidelines and watch this steady growth of government and its attendant assault on our freedom, but what choice do we have? I would vote for a third party candidate if he/she were really trying to return our government to the type envisioned by our founding fathers whether he/she had any chance of winning or not. ER