Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (10858)	9/21/1998 12:38:00 AM
From: ed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

My Long Standing Value is : Husband and wife should be loyal to each other, that is the family value. Besides the family value, every human being's basic human right of privacy should be respected. The President had violated my "Family value", but it does not mean that his basic right as human being should be destroyed by the congress. The Congress had invaded the basic human right of the president which was granted to every citizen by The Constitution. The family problem which viloated the family value should be settled within the boundary of the family between the president and his wife. The violation of human right should be settled within the boundary of law, because human right is the basic right granted to every citizen, including the president , by the constitution. I do not think there should be a linkage between good president and good husband or good father...etc. The president may not be a good husband, but so far he had done a good job as president based on my standard. A good father or husband may not be a good president, Carter is a good example. I am sorry to say that it is the people who elected those congress men into the congress, who are good in political fighting , but short of the enthusiasm to serve the people.

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (10858)	9/21/1998 2:17:00 AM
From: Gerald Walls	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

I think Ken Starr is a partisan hack, and was put in place by partisan hacks Jessie Helms and Lauch Faircloth. Four former Attorneys General would seem to disagree with you. They say, among much else, that Starr is an "individual of the highest personal and professional integrity. As a judge...he exhibited exemplary judgment and commitment to the highest ethical standards and the rule of law." But you don't care about that. Your hero Sick Willie says that Starr's a bad man so he must be. Message 5755819