To: Grainne who wrote (25003 ) 9/21/1998 1:07:00 AM From: Dayuhan Respond to of 108807
Christine, <<I think people enter public service mostly to SERVE their cities, counties, states and countries.>> Do you really believe that? I've always assumed that they are obsessed with prominence, respect, recognition, seeing their mugs on TV, all of which are a headier drug than money to some. And despite those low salaries, they mostly seem to do ok financially, don't they? <<What I would like to know from you, Steve, is where we are going when we start with cynicism in government? It seems that it quickly leads to a very bad place, where we have no expectations.>> I would say that cynicism about government is essential, as is a notion of what we actually expect. Do we want them to be better people than we are, or to run the country better than we could, or both? One of the oddities of the whole debate, to any student of history, is the notion that lying, theft, and sexual misconduct are anything new in government. We love to put our past leaders on pedestals, even if we need to strip out large portions of their histories to do it. But even as we do it, we should be aware of what we do. It's hard enough to compare people to what past leaders actually were, far harder to compare them to our beloved illusions. What do I expect from politicians? Only that they remain reasonably faithful to the platform on which they were elected, and that they manage their area of responsibility effectively. I take it for granted that they're lying, cheating, and stealing. Politics is a rat race, and the winner of a rat race is almost inevitably a rat. As long as the rat does his job better than the other rats, I won't ask him to turn into a gerbil. Cynical, yes, I admit it, but it's hard to observe politics, in this or any other age, without a degree of cynicism setting in. Steve