Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cool who wrote (6578)	9/21/1998 8:51:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 13994

There have been 14 convictions by the Special Prosecutor. It is undisputed that the cost of this investigation has been radically inflated by WH stonewalling and Mr. Clinton's denials about the Lewninsky matter. Place the blame where it belongs. JLA

To: cool who wrote (6578)	9/21/1998 10:03:00 AM
From: Scrapps	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13994

No, what I'm suggesting is this. If Clinton were innocent he'd have welcomed the investigation and allowed it to go forward ASAP in order to get it over with. However, he chose to hamper it...thus prolonging it AND angering Starr. It appears we now have a very similar situation occurring in regard to the bombing in Sudan. An opportunity to prove guilt of the leaders of Sudan in making chemical weapon materials is being hampered by the administration with Mr. Clinton's full participation. For what reason the administration is doing this leaves little choice in what one can conclude.