Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Bartlett who wrote (19415)	9/21/1998 11:46:00 AM
From: IngotWeTrust	Respond to of 116894

U state refering 2 Ur Head'nSand position=name calling? Related 2 Clinton RU. Sheesh. How touchy. Musta hit a nerve. You wanna know something? You can't handle the truth! You wait 5 days to read a thread, 378 some odd posts later, and decide to bitch me out because I disagree w/one dishonest gold derivs player. I call you on it, quote you your own profile, I stay on topic of gold and gold derivatives the entire time, You can't handle it. No skin off of my nose you've just been outted. Those who can't take the scruitiny regarding their inconsistencies of statement on ANY SI thread should not post. Let me state it again...one more time, and I'll type real slow so you don't miss anything. Hutch claims he can't lose and hasn't lost in playing or using gold options/derivative strategies. I continually declare that there are people/institutions who use gold option strategies which cumulatively have synthetically affected the PRICE OF GOLD, THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS THREAD, currently negatively. They all can't be winners like Hutch. Tis illogical. Take it, or leave it. Does not change the truth... the truth about Hutch the truth about you the truth about your positional posture the truth about gold options and their synthetic affect upon the POG! O/49r