Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE STARR REPORT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j_b who wrote (1350)	9/21/1998 12:27:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1533

and I do believe they are crimes Thanks for that honesty -- most Clinton supporters haven't admitted as much even yet. For me, then, the question is this: should we continue in office as the head of the Justice Department, the FBI, the Treasury, the U.S. Armed Forces a person who has committed crimes while in office and while at his post of duty? For me, the answer is no. No matter how much you like his policies, or like him personally, a person who commits crimes (quite intentional crimes, not incidental crimes like speeding, and crimes directly related to the integrity of the U.S. justice system) while in office should not stay in that office.

To: j_b who wrote (1350)	9/21/1998 12:59:00 PM
From: MJ	Respond to of 1533

j b What goes around comes around. So it has for William Jefferson Clinton. Re. this being a personal matter---as a voter and taxpayer who pays the electric bills and upkeep of the White House and government I view anything that happens in the oval office a non-personal matter----it is a political matter. Also, is Monica the only one while he has been President. Has he carried his sexual appetites into the international arena and compromised security? This is only speculation but anything is possible. Resign, impeach---it really doesn't matter----this nation needs to get Clinton out of the White House and return to business. mj