Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : IATV - ACTV Interactive Television -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stonesouls who wrote (2919)	9/21/1998 3:52:00 PM
From: ahhaha	Respond to of 4748

I never divulged who sent me the reply and I'm not confirming that whomever RC is, is the one. I noticed that one of you has posted a lot of "information" presumably germane to speculative decision making in a belated attempt to do damage control. If you and they are so concerned about my claims which you all assert are false, why the entreaties to back off? The truth about the company will reveal itself in the fullness of time. If I add no truth, you have nothing to fear from my posts. It would seem that you aren't so well aware. The only items legally available to the public are those which the hopeful manipulators and charadists release in a timely fashion in order to bag greedy speculators and to thereby unload their positions. Therefore material fact is already available before it hits these threads. Now, as far as you're threats to me go, I'd suggest that you determine just what you're going up against before you brandish them. You might find there is more there than mere elitism. I certainly won't back off except to let the torrent of lemmings pass to their sure reward. By the way the recent exit has forced the market maker to go long. It is probable that the rising torrent will now give the market maker a good gain until the long shares are distributed above to more greedy minnows. That isn't information but it may be far more valuable than what the gamists are giving you.

To: Stonesouls who wrote (2919)	9/21/1998 3:55:00 PM
From: Charles H. Waldron	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4748

To one and all: I thought this was a reasonably civil thread, but then that shows you what I know. I also thought society was past trying to killing the messenger when they didn't like the message. Boy am I naive. Maybe I am totally wrong, but to me due diligence means listening to all points of view and then evaluating the evidence. I didn't read any personal invective in ahhaha's messages. No name calling and no personal insults. Can anyone argue that IATV should be included in a private investment fund? And if ahhaha does not wish to take a flyer on IATV so be it. That does not make his views less valuable nor less interesting to me. The other thing is it is easy to bypass a message if you don't wish to read it, and the author is noted. I hope IATV does very well. It would help me make up some of the paper losses I have suffered this year, but that hope will not prevent me from reading whatever I find regarding the stock.