Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Oracle Corporation (ORCL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Trey McAtee who wrote (8418)	9/21/1998 5:46:00 PM
From: MeDroogies	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19080

You have to be a good guy if you share the nickname I gave my kid....LOL. Of course he's responsible. Also, I love the fact that it's a "right wing conspiracy" that set him up to perjure himself in the Paula Jones testimony. NOW, I agree that the "sex" angle is overplayed. But, I rarely hear anti-Clinton people talking about the sex, unless it's in conjunction with the legal issues. I usually hear his supporters talking about the sex, and rarely about the legal issues UNLESS it's how these "issues are the result of something everyone does" (BTW - I've never cheated on my wife in any way....so not EVERYONE does it). To me, it's an issue of a felony - perjury and obstruction of justice - which is essentially ALL that Nixon got caught on. I don't think Clinton should be impeached (too little, too late), but we do need to discuss the legal ramifications.