SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Cartaway resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Supervalue who wrote (2129)9/24/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: wayne cath  Respond to of 2505
 
Hearing date set

Cartaway Resources Corporation CWA
Shares issued 37,914,563 Sep 23 close $0.06
Thu 24 Sept 98 News Release
Ms. Anne Brown of the Alberta Securities Commission reports
Dates of Sept. 27, 1999 to Nov. 19, 1999, have been set for the hearing of
allegations against Cartaway Resources Corporation, John Ivany, Christopher
Michael Stuart, William DeJong and Walter Nash.
The original notice of hearing dated July 20, 1998, also contained
allegations against First Marathon Securities Limited, Vancouver First
Marathon brokers Robert Arthur Hartvikson and Blayne Barry Johnson, and two
former directors of Cartaway Resources Corporation, Charles Mitchell and
Hugh Mogenson.
The ASC approved a settlement agreement with First Marathon Securities
Limited on July 30, 1998.
A hearing into the allegations against Mr. Hartvikson and Mr. Johnson has
been adjourned to await the outcome of a B.C. Securities Commission hearing
into related issues. The B.C. hearing is scheduled for the months of July
and August 1999.
By an amended notice of hearing dated Sept. 23, 1998, staff of the ASC
discontinued the allegations against Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Mogenson.
(c) Copyright 1998 Canjex Publishing Ltd. canada-stockwatch.com




To: Supervalue who wrote (2129)9/24/1998 11:13:00 PM
From: cruncher  Respond to of 2505
 
Supervalue: I wish they would settle out of court.

The best thing that could happen to shareholders of CWA is for the parties involved to settle out of court.

Just think how messy things would be if they continued on to success. Unfortunately the only ones to suffer is the shareholders.

regards

cruncher



To: Supervalue who wrote (2129)9/25/1998 1:29:00 PM
From: cruncher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2505
 
Supervalue: Maybe the shareholders should send a message.

Next meeting the shareholders should attend and replace directors and management to get the value out of CWA properties that shareholders deserve. Right now we sit here waiting for these parties to get their house in order.

regards

cruncher


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News