SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bananawind who wrote (15305)9/21/1998 4:43:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
jim & All, USTR prepared to go to War



ARTICLE
ARCHIVE

CINEWS
September 21, 1998

USTR prepared to `war' over 3G

By Jeffrey Silva

WASHINGTON-The Clinton administration last week said it is prepared to go to war with
Europe over trade barriers to global competition in the future third-generation mobile phone market,
despite indications the United States has not settled on a 3G policy.

``This office is reviewing the consistency of the European Community's measures with its WTO
obligations. Let me assure you that this administration stands by previous assurances that the United
States will use the World Trade Organization to open foreign markets to U.S. telecommunications
equipment and services,'' said U.S. Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky, responding to
letters from Sen. Ernest Hollings (D-S.C.) and Rep. Robert Matsui (D-Calif.).

On Capitol Hill, House telecom subcommittee Chairman Billy Tauzin (R-La.) on Friday expressed
concern about where 3G policy making was headed and said he will submit written questions to the
Federal Communications Commission on the matter.

Qualcomm Inc., which proposesologies Inc., wireless manufacturers and the loudest U.S.
proponents of a global 3G standard based on a convergence of different Code Division Multiple
Access technologies, aggressively is lobbying Congress and the Clinton administration to keep the
European Union from shutting out technologies other than the one-wideband CDMA-favored by
Europe and its two top wireless equipment manufacturers, Sweden's L.M. Ericsson and Finland's
Nokia Oy.

The European Telecommunications Standards Institute has selected W-CDMA-a technology
based on the Global System for Mobile communications standard used exclusively in Europe and
elsewhere in the world.

At the same time, the European Union is considering a directive-which could be adopted later this
year or in early 1999-that would force its 15-member nations to use an ETSI-approved standard
for pan-European 3G.

``We share your concern that the ETSI standard could lock competing technologies developed in
the United States out of the European market,'' wrote Barshefsky. ``It is our understanding that the
ETSI standard is based on U.S.-developed CDMA technology, but would be incompatible with
second-generation CDMA equipment and with third-generation CDMA equipment manufactured to
a U.S. industry standard known as cdma2000.''

Cdma200 was one the four 3G standards forwarded by the United States to the International
Telecommunication Union in late June. Most of the 15 3G standards Geneva-based ITU received
include CDMA technology.

Because Qualcomm has key patents to CDMA technology it could choose to pursue intellectual
property rights litigation if the EU moves forward with W-CDMA without resolving differences with
Qualcomm.

``We would hope that the EU would amend or stop pending legislation to enforce a single standard
in the European market,'' said Qualcomm spokesman William Bold.

But going that route is fraught with legal and diplomatic complexities that could take years to resolve
and might be rendered meaningless-regardless of whether Qualcomm wins-if the global market
already has decided the issue.

That is why Qualcomm lobbyists are pushing so hard in hopes that U.S. pressure will force the EU
to change its policy.

But that could be difficult. The administration, which had 3G talks with EU officials in Brussels in
July and is meeting American wireless firms on the issue weekly, is apparently not clear in its own
mind what exactly it should be demanding of the EU.

Congress likewise is not of one mind on 3G. Witness the many iterations of the recent Senate
resolution on 3G, before lawmakers finally settled on a largely hollow declaration.

Barshefsky told Hollings and Matsui that European officials told the U.S. delegation (State
Department deputy assistant secretary Vonya McCann and FCC Chairman Bill Kennard) in July
there was no intent to advantage European manufacturers and that ``they claimed they had no
intention to mandate in Europe a single standard prior to the conclusion of an International
Telecommunication Union standards-making process which has just begun and is not scheduled for
completion until early in 1999.''

Kennard, in a recent RCR interview, said he remains skeptical of EU assurances. ``My concern
with the whole ETSI process is there is, in effect, a weighted preference toward certain
manufacturers against others. And I think that's fundamentally not a pro-competitive approach to
take.''

Talks between U.S. and EU officials on 3G, originally intended to take place here this month, have
been pushed back to October.

Complicating U.S. policy formation is the fact that opinions on 3G differ among U.S. wireless
manufacturers and carriers.

Motorola Inc., the largest U.S. mobile communications equipment manufacturer, has been forced
into a neutral corner because it sells GSM and CDMA equipment around the world.

Then, there are personal communications services carriers that operate GSM systems and, while
opposed to EU 3G trade barriers, strongly support W-CDMA going forward. Some GSM
proponents accuse Qualcomm of using trade as a guise for trying to leverage hefty IPR royalties
from other manufacturers.

Qualcomm denies that charge, saying many equipment suppliers-save for Ericsson-have seen fit
to buy CDMA technology licenses from Qualcomm.

New Search

Home Current Issue Archive Handbooks Market Email Subscribe Media Kit Links

Copyright 1998, all rights reserved.
Please report problems to webmaster.rcr@inlet.com
September 21, 1998 - rcrnews.com




To: bananawind who wrote (15305)9/21/1998 4:49:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
All JAPAN caught in the middle of 3G;



ARTICLE
ARCHIVE

CINEWS
September 21, 1998

Japan: Caught in the middle on 3G

By Lynnette Luna

Recent developments in Japan suggest standards leaders there realize they must deal with the
cdma2000 third-generation proposal.

Japan's standards body, the Association of Radio Businesses (ARIB), recently concluded that both
W-CDMA, based on the GSM platform, and cdma2000 third-generation proposals are valid
proposals and meet the objectives of International Mobile Telecommunications-2000-a
technology initiative of the International Telecommunication Union that aims to develop a worldwide
family of systems for next-generation mobile phone technology that will allow for high-speed data
services and global roaming.

In addition, ARIB and the Telecommunications Technology Committee, a Japanese IMT-2000
special committee, have agreed to partner with the American National Standards Institute's 3G
Wireless Ad Hoc committee to create a project that will develop specifications for the ANSI-41
standard and its associated radio interfaces, said George Arnold, a member of the ANSI committee
and director of standards and intellectual property with Lucent Technologies Inc.

Japan already is part of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute's 3G Partnership
Project that aims to develop global specifications for the W-CDMA standard.

Vendors say the moves are significant if cdma2000 technology is ever going to enter Japan because
the country submitted only one 3G standard-GSM-based wideband Code Division Multiple
Access-to the ITU. ARIB has been working to converge the two CDMA standards, but has been
caught in the crossfire of the battle between U.S vendors that favor convergence and European
manufacturers that strongly want W-CDMA technology. All are fighting a political battle for access
to the multibillion-dollar market in the next century that promises Internet-friendly handsets with
sophisticated high-speed data and global roaming features.

ARIB has been unable to iron out some technical differences between the two CDMA standards.
One major difference involves the chip rate (cdma2000 employs 3.686 Megachips per second
while W-CDMA employs 4.096 Mcps). Convergence proponents want the single standard to
operate at 3.6 Mcps to allow for backward compatibility to current cdmaOne Interim Standard-95
networks. W-CDMA advocates claim lowering the chip rate degrades the standard.

U.S. vendors have feared cdma2000 would be pushed out of Japan. They expected Japan to
submit both CDMA standards to the ITU in June, but the country decided to submit only the
W-CDMA standard and leave cdma2000 specifications as secondary options. NTT DoCoMo,
Japan's and the world's largest wireless carrier, strongly backs the W-CDMA standard, and is said
to have a great deal of influence over the standard's process. ARIB already was working with the
W-CDMA proposal DoCoMo submitted with the help of Sweden-based L.M. Ericsson when the
standards body invited the cdma2000 camp to submit its proposal. DoCoMo, with 20 million
subscribers, needs to launch IMT-2000 services in the beginning of 2001 to relieve congestion.

``DoCoMo has said that if you can get the Europeans to change, then we will change,'' said a U.S.
industry executive in June.

Japan only wants one 3G standard. Despite ARIB's efforts to negotiate with ETSI, which has yet to
show interest in converging the two standards, and the United State's Telecommunications Industry
Association and the T1P1 committee-which together submitted four different proposals to the ITU
in June-the Japanese are afraid U.S. and European vendors will never agree.

``There are two alternatives for the Japanese,'' said one Japanese source close to ARIB. ``One is a
converged CDMA standard. The other is two CDMA standards [developed] in parallel.
Everybody has recognized that one standard is better, but they are concerned that the Americans
and Europeans may never agree. Presently, the Japanese RTT proposal is almost identical to the
European proposal, and the Japanese are afraid it would destroy their relationship with the
Europeans if they try to come closer to cdma2000.''

Japan wants to play a significant role in the global scene for 3G technology. The country isolated
itself in the past by deploying a digital standard-developed by DoCoMo-incompatible with the
rest of the world's digital standards. Japanese vendors have been limited in providing infrastructure
worldwide. To make sure the country would not isolate itself again, Japan's leaders years ago set
DoCoMo in charge of taking the lead to develop 3G technology. DoCoMo invited vendors from
around the world to participate in experiments, and L.M. Ericsson and Finland-based Nokia Oy
took the lead, while cdmaOne innovator Qualcomm Inc. lacked the resources at the time to
participate.

Since then, DoCoMo has made technical contributions to ETSI and has signed a memorandum of
understanding with the GSM MoU Association to develop Global System for Mobile
communications technology as the core network technology for 3G services. The carrier is planning
a W-CDMA field test this fall.

Sources say the Japanese Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications is likely to support both
cdma2000 and W-CDMA standards if the ITU backs cdma2000 as one of the IMT-2000 radio
interfaces and Japanese operators want to introduce cdma2000 technology in their markets. Two of
Japan's operators, DDI and IDO, already have committed to cdmaOne technology and have
agreed to jointly develop cdma2000 technology. The two firms said they would support
convergence. Japan Telecom plans to test a W-CDMA network.

But sources also indicate the Japanese know convergence may be the only way to solve
intellectual-property-rights issues. Qualcomm claims to hold key IPRs to W-CDMA technology
and has made clear that it will not grant them unless convergence is achieved. The ITU, which
received 15 proposals that mostly incorporate W-CDMA technology, has said it will throw out by
Dec. 31 standards that have unresolved IPR issues attached.

``As Japan is the first country to actually introduce 3G systems to the market, they eventually may
be put in the position to make their own critical decision without waiting for a possible deal between
the Americans and Europeans,'' said one source.

Meanwhile, convergence of the two CDMA proposals remains a sensitive issue for European GSM
operators that already feel they've taken a bold step in accepting a CDMA standard developed in
Japan for 3G service.

The CDMA Development Group and a group of U.S. IS-95 operators recently toured Europe to
meet with operators and get the convergence issue resolved. Details of the meetings were not made
public.

``We've been pushing very hard for convergence and trying to deal with this on a carrier-to-carrier
basis as opposed to watching the manufacturers battle it out,'' said Perry LaForge, executive
director of the CDG. ``It looks like carriers are going to work together to get this resolved. It's
important for them to get input into the ITU.''

The 3G debate is sure to heat up within the coming months as the ITU begins efforts to harmonize
the various proposals. ETSI said it recognizes that Qualcomm owns CDMA IPRs, but is now
determining whether they are key to the W-CDMA standard. Qualcomm claims to hold broad
patents for W-CDMA technology, including soft-handoff and power control features.

New Search

Home Current Issue Archive Handbooks Market Email Subscribe Media Kit Links

Copyright 1998, all rights reserved.
Please report problems to webmaster.rcr@inlet.com
September 21, 1998 - rcrnews.com




To: bananawind who wrote (15305)9/21/1998 4:52:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
jim All Debate IMT-2000;



ARTICLE
ARCHIVE

CINEWS
September 21, 1998

Debate swirls around IMT-2000

By David R. Siddall

The world's wireless experts are in the midst of analyzing detailed design options for the next
generation of wireless telephone systems. In addition to traditional telephony, these new systems will
provide broad-bandwidth services such as Internet, multimedia and even full-motion video. The new
systems are expected to begin entering markets throughout the world in the next three to four years.

But there are many regulatory and technical issues to be resolved before these new broadband
wireless services can be delivered. While the issues are complex, the decisions that will be made in
the coming months will determine the scope and availability of wireless services for the next decade.

Features

The new systems are referred to generically as ``third-generation,'' or 3G. This term is used
synonymously with designations such as International Mobile Telecommunications-2000
(IMT-2000), the International Telecommunication Union's official nomenclature; and Universal
Mobile Telecommunications Service (UMTS), the European Union's designation that replaced the
earlier Future Land Mobile Public Telecommunications Systems (FLMPTS).

All 3G systems, regardless of over-the-air standards, will have available a common core set of basic
services defined by the ITU. The following are among the attributes the ITU established:

ú Multi-rate services delivering the following minimum bit rates: 2 megabits per second to fixed
locations; 384 kilobits per second to pedestrian users (slow-moving); and 144 kbps for mobile
(automobile speeds).

ú Seamless coverage across pico, micro and macro cells supporting different user densities.

ú Multi-operator capabilities (for roaming).

ú High spectrum efficiency (to maximize capacity).

ú Flexible quality of service (bit rate errors and transmission delay can vary for different
applications).

ú High communications security (to protect content and access).

The principal technical attributes of 3G differ from, and are more complex than, those of 2G in two
fundamental ways.

First, 3G systems will include elements that can be used to provide connection ``from anywhere at
any time, to anywhere at any time.'' This will be accomplished by including satellite and possibly
high-altitude platform components, in addition to terrestrial components, and by providing for
interaction and hand-off among them.

Second, 3G systems will add elements that optimize bandwidth capacity for fixed and pedestrian
uses, as well as for mobile uses. This is a significant deviation from the purely mobile designs of the
first and second generations, and recognizes the technical requirements for attaining the maximum
bandwidth-per-megahertz of spectrum differ for mobile, fixed and pedestrian uses.

3G designs, therefore, contemplate elements that can optimize using spectrum for fixed uses, such as
wireless local loop. Including functionalities in 3G systems that are tailored specifically to fixed uses
could be especially important in the United States, where WLL deployment might foster competition
with wireline services provided by local exchange carriers.

In addition, integrating into a single system both fixed and mobile uses indirectly might alleviate the
severe shortage of telephone numbers by facilitating use of a single phone number for at home, in the
car and at the office. Facsimile and Internet connections also can be through the same system.

Thus 3G potentially could realize a benefit touted at the beginning of this decade for PCS: one
number for each person, with calls automatically routed to the correct location and device.

Small pocket phones also have resulted in substantial use of 2G systems by pedestrians on streets
and in restaurants, especially in urban areas. 3G will permit optimization for low speeds as well,
instead of using specifications that assume movement at 30 to 60 miles per hour.

Policy focus

As recently as May, talk in Washington about 3G or IMT-2000 was more likely to be ascribed to
computers and the Year 2000 glitch than to radio spectrum and a new generation of cellular and
PCS services.

But by August, policy debates over options had replaced initial confusion.

With potentially billions of dollars at stake, during the summer discussion of 3G issues attracted the
attention of some of the top officials at the White House, the Senate, the House of Representatives
and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. This is in addition to the experts that reside in the
more usual venues of the Federal Communications Commission, National Telecommunications and
Information Administration and the Department of State.

As this is being written, the industry continues its own analysis and lobbying while government
officials ponder decisions on the positions that the United States should adopt and advocate at the
ITU and at the next World Radiocommunication Conference, scheduled to take place in the year
2000 (WRC-2000).

Government attention peaked during the normally quiescent dog days of late summer.

In preparation for formulating the U.S. policy positions at WRC-2000, in late August the FCC
requested comments by Sept. 30 on a broad range of spectrum issues implicated by 3G. A week
later, the Senate passed an amendment to the Foreign Appropriations Act to express the ``sense of
the Senate'' that at the ITU the United States should promote multiple 3G standards so as to allow
first- and second-generation systems to operate with 3G systems.

These two issues-spectrum and standards-lie at the heart of the 3G debates.

Spectrum

Initial planning for 3G originated in the early 1990's, when policymakers foresaw that more
spectrum would be needed both to serve the anticipated widespread demand for wireless
connectivity and to furnish increased capacity for new, more advanced services to consumers.

At WARC-92, a band of frequencies in the 2 GHz range was allocated for FLMPTS. In hindsight,
this action appears remarkably prescient, notwithstanding increases in spectrum capacity realized by
implementing digital transmission technologies.

Demand for wireless services is exploding. The original 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands used for
first- and second-generation cellular no longer provide sufficient capacity in areas of Europe and
Asia for basic telephony at a time when consumers are increasingly interested in adding wireless
data services. Policymakers in these countries therefore are focused on opening the 2 GHz bands to
3G systems in the very near future, and some countries already have initiated license assignments for
these bands.

In contrast, during the mid-1990's in the United States, up to six new personal communications
services systems were authorized to use the 2 GHz bands. These licensees currently are initiating
services in addition to similar services being marketed by two cellular carriers and Nextel
Communications Inc. in the lower bands.

Today there are five or more competing wireless carriers providing an array of mobile telephony
services in most major U.S. markets.

The result is that outside the United States an urgency is felt to initiate construction of 3G systems in
the 2 GHz band to meet demands for service that no longer can be met in the lower bands. The new
operators will populate virgin 2 GHz spectrum with no need to consider compatibility with 2G
systems.

In the United States, however, substantial numbers of 2 GHz PCS licensees either are still
constructing or have just finished constructing their 2G systems. While these licensees will encounter
no regulatory delay or impediment to implementing 3G systems if they wish, concerns with channel
alignments and total spectrum requirements are paramount. In addition, it is unclear how a current
operator might provide service with an integrated satellite component if it wished.

On Aug. 26, the FCC issued a comprehensive Public Notice soliciting comments until Sept. 30 on a
series of twenty questions addressing service types and traffic characteristics, spectrum
requirements, spectrum location, and future technological advances and spectrum efficiency (see
fcc.gov.

The record in this proceeding will set the stage for future spectrum discussions both in the United
States and at WARC-2000.

Standards

There also are substantial differences in outlook relating to over-the-air transmission standards.

In Europe during the 1980's, first-generation systems consisted of multiple analog standards,
whereas in the United States all cellular operators used the FCC-prescribed analog Advanced
Mobile Phone Service standard. The result was substantial economies of scale and roaming
capabilities using AMPS that did not exist in Europe, and the U.S. AMPS standard became the
global de facto standard.

With 2G, roles reversed. Policymakers in Europe, perhaps understanding the success of the U.S.
AMPS-based system, through the European Telecommunication Standards Institute successfully
forged an agreement for all carriers to use digital Global System for Mobile communications for their
second-generation systems. In the United States, despite substantial efforts, no consensus was
reached on a single digital standard.

These different experiences with standards, coupled with the FCC licensing 2 GHz spectrum for 2G
services while the rest of the world did not, tend to have U.S. policymakers focused in a different
direction than their European and Asian counterparts. As discussed above, Europe and Asia's
1980's and 1990's cellular systems now are outgrowing the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands. For
these countries, speed to 2 GHz service is a predominant concern.

Conversely, in the United States where 2 GHz spectrum already is occupied with 2G systems,
concerns with 2G and 3G compatibility predominate. This is especially true because all 2 GHz PCS
systems are virtually brand new.

In 1988 the FCC deleted the principal AMPS requirement from the cellular rules, permitting cellular
operators to implement digital technologies. This change, coupled with the FCC's 1993 decision
declining to prescribe standards for the 2 GHz PCS bands, resulted in four basic standards being
used within the cellular and PCS bands: AMPS (in the lower-band, first-generation systems), GSM,
Time Division Multiple Access and Code Division Multiple Access.

Unlike the earlier situation in Europe, however, competitive multiple providers in each service area
made roaming possible, albeit more difficult than if everyone used the same standards. Indeed, high
auction prices for PCS licenses were supported in part by the perceived need for each of the three
basic digital systems-GSM, CDMA and TDMA-to obtain as national a footprint as possible.

In the public debate on 3G, parties are revisiting the issues associated with standards-or the lack
thereof.

In Europe, ETSI is strongly promoting wideband CDMA as the single worldwide standard. It has
been reported the European Community may consider mandating the use of W-CDMA to the
exclusion of all other standards, which has prompted complaints to the U.S. Trade Representative
that such action would constitute an impermissible trade barrier.

W-CDMA is backward compatible with second-generation GSM and TDMA systems (GSM is a
variation of TDMA), but not with CDMA second-generation systems. This, and issues related to
intellectual property rights, has Qualcomm Inc. vociferously objecting to worldwide adoption of the
proposed W-CDMA standard (Qualcomm's white paper on the subject can be read at
qualcomm.com.

Qualcomm articulates support for a single global standard, but one that is compatible with all
second-generation systems.

The GSM Alliance opposes both Qualcomm positions. The Alliance argues that backward
compatibility would be attained through multiple standards and that altering the W-CDMA standard
would impair its spectral efficiency.

Others have suggested Qualcomm also might increase its intellectual property stake in W-CDMA if
its proposals were adopted.

On June 30, the U.S. government submitted four 3G standards to ITU for its consideration,
including both W-CDMA consistent with ETSI's standard and the cdma2000 system supported by
CDMA operators and Qualcomm.

As this article was being finalized, the standards debate reached the floor of the U.S. Senate. On
Sept. 2, in the form of a ``sense of the Senate'' amendment to the Foreign Appropriations bill, the
Senate by voice vote deemed it ``critical to the interests of the United States'' that 2G systems be
able to operate with 3G systems, and found that ``[a]doption of an open and inclusive set of multiple
standards, including all four submitted by the Department of State, would enable existing systems to
operate with ... [3G systems].''

Conclusion

At this time, there is little indication that common ground is being identified and a consensus forming.
While positions on the standards issues are firmly defined and attempts to find consensus engaged,
spectrum issues only now are being addressed seriously.

It is unclear how much additional spectrum may be required, and when, but this issue is crucial to
the entire enterprise. There is no substitute for adequate and suitable spectrum. It may be that a
roll-out over a period of years can be planned. But if comments filed with the FCC by Sept. 30
support the PCIA estimate of 400-500 additional megahertz needed by 2010, the standards dispute
may prove to have been merely the warm-up act.



David Siddall is the former wireless and international advisor to senior FCC Commissoner Susan
Ness. He practices law in Washington, D.C., at Verner Liipfert, specializing in new technologies,
domestic and international spectrum issues, and wireless and wireline competition.

New Search

Home Current Issue Archive Handbooks Market Email Subscribe Media Kit Links

Copyright 1998, all rights reserved.
Please report problems to webmaster.rcr@inlet.com
September 21, 1998 - rcrnews.com




To: bananawind who wrote (15305)9/21/1998 4:54:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
jim All, NEC moves on W-CDMA;



ARTICLE
ARCHIVE

CINEWS
September 21, 1998

NEC moves on with W-CDMA for early-bird advantage

By Lynnette Luna

Determined not to miss out on market opportunities provided by third-generation technology, NEC
Corp. has taken early steps into the 3G arena.

The Japanese manufacturer has begun operation of a new subsidiary in Singapore that will design
and develop hardware and software for wideband Code Division Multiple Access base-station
systems. Earlier this year, the company created a joint venture with ERA Technology Ltd. in the
United Kingdom to develop W-CDMA infrastructure for the European market.

NEC will be one of many vendors that will fight it out for the multi-billion-dollar mobile phone
market in the next century that promises Internet-friendly handsets and sophisticated high-speed
data and global-roaming features. Japanese vendors, limited in the past from becoming strong
worldwide contenders because of the isolated Personal Digital Cellular standard adopted by their
own country, are likely to enter aggressively the 3G market.

NEC, along with other major vendors such as Sweden-based L.M. Ericsson, has been working
with NTT DoCoMo-Japan's largest mobile phone operator-to develop W-CDMA technology.
NEC expects this involvement to give it a head start in the market.

NEC said in the near future it plans to market W-CDMA systems, which are based on the Global
System for Mobile communications platform. The United Kingdom and Japan plan to grant 3G
spectrum as early as next year. The United Kingdom will auction four licenses by mid-1999, while
the Japanese Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications has set the stage to offer three 3G licenses
in each operating area by the end of next year.

By 2005, NEC hopes to attain worldwide sales of $3.7 billion in the W-CDMA business, of which
about $740 million will come from Asian markets outside Japan.

NEC so far has installed its analog and digital infrastructure in 13 countries and is promoting Interim
Standard-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) systems in Asia and Latin America. The company has only a
handful of cdmaOne contracts around the world, with the majority in Brazil. In July, NEC received
an order for its cdmaOne-based fixed wireless network from Russia and Mongolia. In Japan, the
company provides infrastructure for four PDC networks, and it has deployed microwave and
personal handyphone system networks in Asia and Latin America.

The company reported net sales of $12.6 million for fiscal 1998 from its communications and
equipment business segment. Japanese newspapers indicate the company is expected to post an
interim loss of about $76.3 million for the fiscal half-year ending Sept. 30. A sluggish semiconductor
market and weak sales of communications equipment were among the main causes of the poor
earnings, indicated one published report.

Still undecided in the 3G arena is what air interfaces the International Telecommunication Union will
come up with early next year as a family of standards. Standards bodies around the world submitted
3G standards for IMT-2000 technology consideration to the ITU. Most standards submitted are
based on the W-CDMA standard, though Korea and the United States also submitted the
cdma2000 standard, based on IS-95 technology.

CdmaOne innovator Qualcomm Inc. claims to own key intellectual property rights to the
W-CDMA standard and has said it will not grant those rights unless the standard is converged with
the cdma2000 standard.

New Search

Home Current Issue Archive Handbooks Market Email Subscribe Media Kit Links

Copyright 1998, all rights reserved.
Please report problems to webmaster.rcr@inlet.com
September 21, 1998 - rcrnews.com




To: bananawind who wrote (15305)9/21/1998 4:56:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
jim All, Qualcomm-Leap News;



ARTICLE
ARCHIVE

CINEWS
September 21, 1998

Qualcomm makes leap to two companies

By Lynnette Luna

Qualcomm Inc. said it expects to distribute common shares of Leap Wireless International
Inc.-Qualcomm's spun-off wireless communications carrier-Sept. 23 after the close of marketing
trading.

The Securities and Exchange Commission indicated it has no further comments to the registration
statement filed by Leap Wireless. Regular public trading of Leap Wireless shares under the ticker
symbol ``LWIN'' is expected to begin on the day following the distribution date, or on about
Thursday, Sept. 24, said Qualcomm.

Qualcomm indicated in late May it was considering spinning off most of its assets in wireless
operating companies in part to boost the company's earnings in future quarters.

Leap Wireless plans to deploy Code Division Multiple Access (cdmaOne) fixed and mobile
networks in domestic and international markets. Qualcomm is transferring to Leap all of its joint
venture and equity interests in Pegaso Communicaciones-which won personal communications
services licenses in Mexico-Metrosvyaz of Russia, Telesystems of Ukraine, OzPhone Pty. Ltd. of
Australia and certain other development-stage businesses that include opportunities in the United
States and Chile.

Leap International's Form 10 indicates the company holds a small investment in Chase
Telecommunications Inc., a U.S. C-block PCS licensee that plans to offer cdmaOne service during
the fourth quarter of 1998 in Chattanooga, Tenn., followed by launches in Nashville, Knoxville and
Memphis. Current intentions are for Chase to arrange roaming agreements and use brand
recognition under the PrimeCo Personal Communications L.P. brand name. Qualcomm is an
equipment supplier.

Qualcomm's strategy has been to enter into strategic alliances with domestic and international
emerging wireless telecom operating companies in order to expand cdmaOne technology
worldwide. However, these alliances often have required Qualcomm to invest substantial equity in
the operating company as well as a commitment from the operating company to purchase cdmaOne
equipment from Qualcomm.

Without a spinoff of the assets, Qualcomm would have continued to recognize start-up operating
losses associated with some of the operating companies and would be limited in its ability to
recognize revenues from equipment sales to these companies.

New Search

Home Current Issue Archive Handbooks Market Email Subscribe Media Kit Links

Copyright 1998, all rights reserved.
Please report problems to webmaster.rcr@inlet.com
September 21, 1998 - rcrnews.com




To: bananawind who wrote (15305)9/21/1998 4:57:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
jim, All, goin fishing, bye.

All the best,

MIchael



To: bananawind who wrote (15305)9/21/1998 5:03:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
jim All One more; P C S - Latin America; bye



ARTICLE
ARCHIVE

CINEWS
September 21, 1998

PCS in Latin America-evaluating the potential

By Edward Czarnecki

The Latin American wireless market is poised to enter the next stage of competition with increased
market liberalization and additional licensing of personal communications services. Basic changes
are underway in the Latin American wireless industry that are altering the competitive landscape,
creating new user segments and driving new consumption patterns. These changes are directly
related to the increasingly competitive character of the wireless voice industry resulting from the
introduction of PCS.

PCS is the latest generation of products and services to be launched in the Latin
American/Caribbean wireless voice communications markets. Broadband PCS will offer users
enhanced cellular-like services such as two-way voice and data communications in the 1.9 GHz
range.

The 1998-1999 time frame will be a major milestone in the Latin American wireless industry as true
competition becomes realized in the marketplace. With PCS already in service in Puerto Rico and
networks being built out in Chile, we soon will see broadband PCS being offered in a diversity of
markets, including Guatemala, the Dominican Republic and Mexico, catalyzing what already was a
burgeoning wireless industry. In our view, many of the main issues revolve around pricing. One of
the main questions is what differences will emerge between cellular and PCS pricing, and how fast
competition will drive down pricing.

We expect that PCS will increase mobile wireless voice subscriber growth through increased
service offerings and a lower cost of service. The declining total cost of wireless service will help
motivate subscriber growth as service becomes more affordable to greater segments of the market.
This article is offered as a general overview of growth prospects for mobile voice communications in
Latin America and the Caribbean.

Argentina, Chile and Mexico

Chile was the first Latin American country to issue PCS licenses. In Chile, PCS 1.9 GHz spectrum
allocations were awarded to two providers in December 1996: Chilesat (one license) and Entel
(two licenses). Both operators currently are in the process of building out their networks-a Code
Division Multiple Access system for Chilesat, and a Time Division Multiple Access system for Entel.
Entel will use one of its PCS licenses to provide high-mobility PCS service, and the other for
short-range fixed/mobile service.

In May, Mexico closed a PCS auction process begun almost six months earlier in November 1997.
The winning bids for all the PCS and fixed wireless licenses totaled [more than] $1.06 billion. After
128 rounds of bidding concluded May 8, some of the big winners included: the SPC consortium,
which won all nine A-band 30 MHz PCS licenses; Qualcomm Inc., which won B-band 30 MHz
PCS licenses in five regions, plus 10 MHz PCS licenses in Regions 3, 5, 7 and 8; Midicell, which
was awarded a B-band PCS license in Region 7 and 10 MHz licenses in Regions 2, 6 and 9;
Telcel, the cellular affiliate of Telmex that won 10 MHz licenses in all nine regions; and Iusacell,
which won 10 MHz PCS licenses in Regions 1 and 4 for a total of $61.7 million.

After much delay, Argentina's PCS regulations are still in the process of being issued. In January
1997, Argentina's President Menem signed a decree authorizing the auction of two PCS
concessions. These two PCS concessions will cover Buenos Aires in competition with the two
incumbent cellular operators: Minifon and Movicom. As of August, Argentina was studying a plan to
sell licenses for new mobile telephone services outside the capital of Buenos Aires, a bid to
circumvent a lawsuit by a potential bidder that is arguing the bidding process is not competitive
because it allows companies with existing cellular licenses to compete for the new PCS licenses.
The government, which had expected to garner at least $300 million from the PCS licenses, now
may sell two licenses in the north of the country and two in the south. In July 1998, the Argentine
government had sought to change the bidding rules and implement an open outcry system in an
effort to circumvent a lawsuit, which prompted an Argentine judge in April 1998 to block the PCS
auction indefinitely.

The demand for wireless

We expect the PCS subscriber base will grow very rapidly. Important for the historic growth has
been the growing awareness of mobile communications, due primarily to marketing in the cellular
telephone industry. In addition, all these industries have been undergoing rapid consolidation.
Cellular identified a need for two-way mobile communications, targeted the business user,
developed the service and aggressively marketed their services. Decreasing unit costs and declining
monthly fees also have driven growth. We would expect PCS to exhibit similar tendencies and
trends.

PCS will not offer auction winners access to virgin territory. In fact, many of the services that PCS
initially will provide are already supplied either in a less sophisticated form (with fewer features) or
more expensively by entrenched cellular companies. At the end of 1996, there were just more than
6.2 million cellular subscribers throughout Latin America and the Caribbean-a penetration of only
1.4 cellular subscribers per 100 inhabitants. In Chile, there were more than 314,000 cellular
subscribers by the end of 1996, a penetration rate of only 2.1 percent. In Argentina, regional
duopolies provided service to more than 671,000 subscribers at the end of 1996, giving a
penetration of 1.95 percent. In Mexico, cellular providers serviced more than 978,000 subscribers
at the end of that year for a total penetration of 1.12 percent.

By the end of 1997, BIA Consulting Inc. found that regionwide cellular subscribers passed 11.2
million, a growth of 81 percent over the prior year. In Brazil's cellular market-which accounts for
41 percent of Latin American/Caribbean subscribers-net activations increased dramatically,
driving the Brazilian market to 4.55 million by the end of 1997. Though not likely to license PCS
service until well after the year 2000, the Brazilian market deserves special mention because of its
immense opportunity. For example, BCP (BellSouth Corp.'s Brazilian cellular franchise) gained
more than 485,000 customers in Sao Paulo and more than 50,000 in the northeast region of Brazil
after only four months. BCP also had an additional 550,000 people on a waiting list in Sao Paulo.
BCP has been adding approximately 30,000 customers per week. Service in northeastern Brazil
began in June 1998.

The Mexican mobile voice market continues to demonstrate strong growth potential. Mexico
experienced an increase of more than 67 percent as its subscriber base surged from 1.05 million in
1996 to almost 1.8 million in 1997. By mid-1998 Telcel's wireless network had an existing
subscriber base of 1.6 million. More than 50 percent of the subscribers use the prepaid service,
which has been one of the key contributors to the rapid subscriber growth. Telcel has experienced
subscriber growth at a rate of 50 percent during the last eight months and expects this growth rate
to continue over the next few years.

Cellular growth rates were quite different in the 1996-1997 timeframes in each of the other new
PCS markets. Chile's relatively strong cellular subscriber growth of 44.5 percent gave that market a
year-end 1997 base of 454,000, up from more than 314,000 in 1996. The Dominican Republic
experienced modest cellular subscriber growth of 19.6 percent, bringing its cellular base to 97,000
subscribers at the end of 1997. In mid-1998, both Codetel and Tricom were moving to install PCS
networks in that market. Tricom's network will deploy capacity to connect approximately 36,000
PCS/wireless local loop subscribers by the end of 1999. Guatemala's very modest subscriber
growth of 7.1 percent resulted in a year-end 1997 subscriber base of 46,500.

Argentina obtained more than 1.3 million net subscriber additions in 1997, to yield a total base of
more than 2.01 million subscribers.

Much of this growth was attributed to the introduction of Calling Party Pays in Argentina that year.
After the introduction of CPP in April 1997, the market enjoyed new activations of up to 100,000
per month-fueled by the launch of CPP. However, by the start of 1998, new activations dropped
to half that level. We soon may see a second burst of new subscriber activations in the interior of the
country. CTI-an operator in the interior of Argentina, had about 490,000 subscribers by
mid-1998, and was preparing to launch prepaid service to stimulate subscriber growth in its
operating regions. A second issue facing the Argentine cellular market has been serious customer
payment problems. Because of inadequate screening of new activations, several of the cellular
operators have been forced to disconnect several thousand subscribers per month.

Other markets that still are wrestling with PCS regulation have realized quite respectable market
growth. Colombia saw its cellular market surge from 516,781 subscribers in 1996 to 1.26 million
subscribers in 1997. The Colombian cellular incumbents effectively have blocked any plans to
tender PCS in that market before September 1999, when their market exclusivity expires.
Venezuela, which has had difficulties in licensing PCS because of regulatory uncertainties, realized
cellular market growth of more than 54 percent as its subscriber base moved from 475,000 in 1996
to more than 733,000 in 1997. The introduction of Global System for Mobile communications
cellular service by Digitel, a third cellular operator serving the interior portions of Venezuela, could
provide that country's market with up to 150,000 cellular phone customers by December of 1999.

Market developments in Puerto Rico may be generally indicative of the potential for PCS growth in
the region. In one year of service, Centennial [Cellular]'s 1.9 GHz CDMA system gained a
14-percent market share in Puerto Rico. In the second half of the year, the two AMPS cellular
providers saw an increasing reduction in their net subscriber additions. PRT's net subscriber
additions fell from 16.8 percent in the first six months of 1997 to 11.5 percent in the second half of
1997. CCPR's net subscriber increases fell form 17 percent in the first half of the year to 9.4
percent in the second half.

This rapid growth sets the stage for the introduction of personal communications services in the
region. By the year 2003, it is quite possible that we will see wireless voice communications services
achieve a total penetration of 11.3 percent of the Latin American/Caribbean population, up form a
total 2.5-percent penetration in 1997 and an expected 5.4-percent penetration in 1999. Below, we
illustrate the expected growth trend for cellular and PCS subscribers in the region.

BIA projects cellular and PCS subscriber levels throughout Latin America will reach almost 43.6
million by the end of 2001. This means that region-wide penetration of these services will be just
over 9 percent at the end of 2001. We expect that PCS will drive mobile voice subscriber growth
through increased service offerings and prompting a lower total cost of service. By the end of 2001,
Latin America could account for 7.4 percent of the world's cellular/PCS subscribers, up from 5.5
percent at the end of 1997. Below, we illustrate our growth projections for combined cellular/PCS
growth in several selected near-future PCS markets in the region.

Pricing and Pricing Plans

The declining total cost of service will drive wireless subscriber growth to the levels discussed
above. Significant gains in wireless voice penetration will be made as service becomes more
affordable to greater segments of the marketplace. The cost of airtime is ultimately what will drive
subscriber growth in the increasingly competitive wireless voice market. Additional competition from
PCS is expected to force prices further downward, making wireless voice service more affordable
to a wider range of potential subscribers.

Trends in Service Pricing

Average revenue per unit has been declining. In general, average monthly bill have been declining
due to an increase of the portion of non-business subscribers relative to the total percentage of new
activations. This has had the effect of lowering the average cellular bill and depressing ARPU.

Average rates per minute have also been falling. Entel PCS expects cheaper rates to fuel explosive
growth in the country's wireless market. Entel PCS, the Chilean operator, is strategizing that says
lower prices tied to tariff cuts will boost its client base in the wireless market faster than expected.
By early 1999, wireless phone users will not have to pay a charge when called from a fixed
telephone. That should cut about one-third from the average monthly bill of about 17,000 pesos
(US$35) paid by Entel's clients. The wireless company hopes to capture about one-third of the
Chilean market, which it expects to double to about 1.5 million customers next year. That would
yield a penetration level of approximately 11 percent.

Roaming charges have also begun to decline. This is due to such factors as: less costly reciprocal
arrangements between operators; cluster consolidation by certain operators (as in Chile with the
merger of CTC Celular and VTR); and/or outright competition between operators (the elimination
of daily roaming fees by the Argentina B-band operators CTI and Miniphone was prompted by
elimination of such fees by the A-band operators-Telecom Personal, Unifon and Movicom-all of
which have ownership by the wireline operators).

Calling Party Pays has proven to be a strong driver of subscriber growth, at least temporarily. As
noted earlier, the Argentine market was stimulated by remarkable subscriber growth levels after the
introduction of Calling Party Pays. However, after euphoric growth over eight months, cellular
subscriber levels settled back down by the start of 1998. Broadly similar phenomena also occurred
in Brazil, Peru and Uruguay after the introduction of calling party pays. Other markets are planning
the introduction of Calling Party Pays, including Mexico, which will implement the plan for cellular
and PCS toward the end of 1998.

Prepaid cellular has become a major phenomenon in Latin American Cellular, a trend that the new
PCS entrants will have to accommodate. Mexico's Iusacell, for example, reports that nearly 35
percent of its customers subscribe to pre-paid plans. These users also tend to be less avid users of
airtime, further depressing ARPU. Pre-paid services should be structured to not only drive
incremental subscriber growth but to do so in a way that minimizes our risk on handset subsidies as
well as help reduce churn. The majority of handset costs should be recouped on the initial sale of a
pre-paid account. Credit scoring should also be tight for post-paid service, and potential customers
who do not meet the credit hurdles should be put on the pre-paid plan. Overall, pre-paid could
have positive impact on PCS business, despite its effect on ARPU.

We should expect roaming-both national and international-to be important factors in future PCS
operators' revenue streams. The amount of revenue that roaming will supply for wireless operators
in both proportional and absolute terms could well increase, as growth in roaming airtime and usage
may more than offset these price reductions.

PCS Pricing

We expect that PCS revenues will be derived from a number of sources very similar to that of
cellular. The primary cellular industry revenue sources are access fees (for monthly access to the
service), usage charges (for minutes of use) and roaming revenues (for use outside the home service
area).

Increasing competition will reduce prices and increase aggregate demand. Price changes are
expected to generate new types of users and to stimulate overall wireless usage. As competition
grows between and among the cellular and PCS operators, overall price declines will occur. While
PCS operators are likely to enter the market at prices slightly lower than cellular, cellular operators
will respond wither by lowering prices, offering enhanced services or increased packages of
included airtime.

We expect PCS providers to initially enter the market with a cost of service somewhere in the range
of 15 percent to 20 percent below the incumbent cellular operators. After the introduction of PCS
competition, the cellular operators could match the price decreases initially introduced by PCS
operators. The cellular incumbents also could introduce their own version of any differentiated PCS
pricing packages.

Decreases in the cost of service will make wireless voice service more affordable and encourage
usage in broader segments of the market. As mentioned earlier, usage among cellular subscribers
has been declining as ``lower-tier'' users comprise a greater percentage of the base. Depending on
pricing and marking strategies, the introduction of PCS could result in significant subscriber growth
for the entire wireless industry.

Conclusions: Evaluating the PCS Opportunity

Differentiating PCS from other wireless services

PCS can-and will need to- distinguish itself from the Latin American cellular incumbents. PCS
promises a network infrastructure capable of providing multiple wireless services to residential and
business subscribers. This PCS infrastructure will offer multiple services (voice, data and fax), digital
technologies, superior customer service, lower or differentiated pricing from cellular, and the
possibility of alternative local access (regulation permitting).

The overall components of service will determine the true value-added ti the end user. For example,
PCS operators can be expected to offer more free enhanced services than cellular operators do at
this early stage. Likewise, PCS digital networks will provide users with improved sound quality and
more increased security than analog cellular. These advantages are diminished sharply, however, in
markets where the cellular incumbents have made serious efforts to expand and digitize their
networks. Cellular will continue to provide its subscribers with a far greater coverage area than PCS
and the ability to roam nationwide and internationally-at least initially.

We expect market competition will be fierce, with cellular incumbents fighting hard to maintain their
market position. In most cases, the cellular incumbents will have substantial financial resources and a
level of commitment that imply an ability and a willingness to compete aggressively with any
company that threatens their market positions.

A prime example of the market power of a combined cellular incumbent/PCS entrant is Telcel,
Mexico's largest wireless network operator. Telcel will construct a nationwide
dual-band/dual-mode (800MHz/1900MHz, analog/digital) network employing its new 1900MHz
licenses recently won in each of the nine Mexican regions. Telcel will significantly boost network
capacity by integrating the 1900MHz and 800MHz channels in a common infrastructure for
seamless handoff by users. This is being done in preparation for the rapid subscriber growth
expected when calling party pays legislation is implemented towards the end of 1998.

Valuing PCS Opportunity

In order to evaluate PCS opportunities properly, sophisticated demand, pricing and financial models
should be developed. These models must incorporate projections of wireless services nationwide
and in the specific market. They also must include assumptions about market fractionalization due
tot he competitive mix int he market. Economic factors, such as rate assumptions, expense
projections and capital expenditure estimates also will have a significant impact on value. In addition,
the model must lend itself to conducting sensitivity analysis on key variables.

In developing a financial model to evaluate the PCS opportunity, it is critical that strategies are
defined and reasonable assumptions are made.

For the incumbent, the priority will be on maintaining revenue and earnings stream, legacy systems,
upgrading networks to digital, migrating high value customers and controlling churn. For the new
PCS entrant, the challenge will be to build a competitive footprint, to load the network quickly and
retain these customers, to raise prices after the promotions finish, and gain a distribution foothold or
find new channels. The new PCS entrants would be well-served to bear in mind that revenue is
more important than number of customers. Maintaining a focus on cost per subscriber should
maintain flexibility through sustained price wars.

BIA Consulting Inc., a full-service global telecom and media consulting and investment banking firm
in Chantilly, Va.

New Search

Home Current Issue Archive Handbooks Market Email Subscribe Media Kit Links

Copyright 1998, all rights reserved.
Please report problems to webmaster.rcr@inlet.com
September 21, 1998 - rcrnews.com