SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dougjn who wrote (4300)9/21/1998 4:50:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
He appeared voluntarily after he was issued a subpoena. That being said, he still took an oath to tell the truth, whole truth and nothing but the truth. Once the POTUS agreed to testify he did not have the "legal" option of not answering(apart from taking the fifth). He said at the outset of his Grand Jury appearance (from the report)"I'm looking forward to the opportunity of testifying. I will do so completely and truthfully." Obviously this president reneged on his promise to answer questions. He read a prepared statement in which he admits "inappropriate contact" and then refused to answer specific questions other than to say it was not intercourse and did not involve the direct touching of Lewinsky's breasts or genitals. The president spent much of his 4 hours engaging in soliloquy and imo, "filibustering" in order to avoid answering Grand Jurors questions. Again, anyone else would be held in contempt. bp



To: dougjn who wrote (4300)9/21/1998 5:36:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Moreso than moral indignation, Starr is angry at the White House for what he feels is purjury and obstruction on the other scandals: White Water, Filegate, Travelgate, etc. Hence, he was trying to pursue the same line of infractions in the intern scandal.