Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (4361)	9/21/1998 6:28:00 PM
From: dougjn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Yes, there is that factual conflict. Though when one excludes touching through clothing, and touching through or with an object, as the Pres. did, it narrows the conflict considerably. Also, the Pres. emphasized the intent to stimulate requirement of the definition. Which would also exclude an accidental or fleeting contact. The conflict may not be so great. Lewinsky is not at all necessarily to be fully belived on this. She got made at the suggestions the Pres. was saying it was all "one way". She could well have been motivated to not seem a fool. She apparently felt that claim made her seem one. She has a long history of lying easily and often, by her own admissions. ANd she may well have thought this was no central issue for the President's legal health. Therefore "OK" for her to lie about. I don't know. It's no slam dunk. And nothing to conduct a Congressional investigation over either. Doug