Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (29585)	9/21/1998 6:49:00 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33344

Scumbria, It is also obvious that there is no clear cut case of perjury. If this is not a clear cut case of perjury, I don't know what is. I don't know what your standard is, but if it is higher than what Starr proved, then you must be advocating releasing majority of the prison population, because people go to jail with less evidence supporting their convictions. Joe

To: Scumbria who wrote (29585)	9/21/1998 8:34:00 PM
From: patrick tang	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33344

Re: It is mind boggling that the little weasel Ken Starr, was allowed to ask the President of the United States such questions. Scumbria, Which pillow have you been hiding under? bg:) Welcome to the new age - the political correctness age! For more definition of such stuff, DO read some NOW pamflets on men-bashings and Clinton vs Paula Jones/Monica. Very interesting readings. As much as you might think such 'horizontal' feminine 'logical' thinkings cannot exist, a lot of these are daily fares down at the court-houses and government legislative chambers. patrick patrick tang

To: Scumbria who wrote (29585)	9/21/1998 8:36:00 PM
From: John Ritter	Respond to of 33344

You are correct and this is the best civics review I have ever experienced. There was a time past say when the Spanish empire ruled the world, that they would now haul off our leader to the stone prison for he has admitted his crime. The details which everyone finds so stunning are the result of several centuries of laws governing due process and individual rights. We should note that laws, under our current form of government, are subject to change by the people. It seems to me that we now have too many laws and lawyers, but I could be wrong, perhaps this exercise is necessary to remind us of what it is like to be railroaded. Darn good story too!