SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougjn who wrote (4381)9/21/1998 6:57:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Doug, you thus agree that Clinton is a misogynist. This is the term Bill Ginsburg used on January 21, when this thing exploded. Gingrich, when he heard that Clinton testified to never even touching her while she sucked away, supposedly said yesterday in a closed meeting that any man that did that, if true, must be a misogynist.



To: dougjn who wrote (4381)9/21/1998 6:59:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
If she is in Maryland and Lewinsky is in DC as has been reported then they are not illegal. Those calls are interstate calls and come within the federal wiretap law which requires only one party to consent. State law is trumped. JLA



To: dougjn who wrote (4381)9/21/1998 7:03:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
The ones made in Maryland are "most assuredly" in question. Since the calls were "interstate", the federal statute may apply in which case, party notification is not required. Gee doujn, I'm not a lawyer and I think I've been batting 1000 against you on the legal points today. Where' d you say you went to law school? <g> bp


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News