Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe Sabatini who wrote (66548)	9/21/1998 7:47:00 PM
From: jhg_in_kc	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 176387

Joe, lighten up. the man was trapped by Starr and the Lewinsky tapes and while he was trying not to lie he was he said deliberately trying not to be helpful to his political enemies. That's understandable. So he lied. Let's dont say this is perjury. Let's dont try to over tun an election. Here's why-- if we do this, we take a big step down ther road toward turning this counttry from a consitutional democcracy into a banana republic. The next president and the next after him will be impeached if the opposition has the will to do it. whe are in danger of having a fourth, unelected branch of government, the office of the special prosecutor, empowered with ther right to badger and indict a president . At the very least this changes the balance of powers of our government and moves it towards the model of Iran, where the repesentaties in congress serve at the pleasure of the mullahs, who oversee morality. What do you say to that? jhg

To: Joe Sabatini who wrote (66548)	9/21/1998 8:32:00 PM
From: Naggrachi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

>>Nobody has to attempt to smear the president. The man is a liar, a panderer, an adulterer, and most importantly a perjuror >> OK Mr. Robertson, tell us how you really feel. Zead

To: Joe Sabatini who wrote (66548)	9/21/1998 8:36:00 PM
From: rudedog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 176387

Joe - The man would be serving multiple life sentences in the private sector just for his perjury crimes I have resisted getting into this, but you should understand that almost no one ever gets charged with purjury for nonmaterial statements in a civil trial, let alone convicted. Clinton did not get special treatment, and if he is charged he will be one of the few ever called to task for this kind of behavior.

To: Joe Sabatini who wrote (66548)	9/21/1998 8:43:00 PM
From: Venkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

Its all a communist part on Starrs part..At the risk of millions of life savings and retirement.....We can prove to the world that Clinton got some nookie...I bet you never got any...I am faithful to my wife so dont get me wrong but to destroy the worlds finances behind an affair...hmmm I guess if you were short..it would be great

To: Joe Sabatini who wrote (66548)	9/22/1998 5:36:00 AM
From: Frank Ellis Morris	Respond to of 176387

>>Most people have to get back to reality, to realize that we cannot excuse crimes just because they are committed by a high government official. It makes us all look bad.<< Good morning Joe, I am not saying that what the President did was anything to write to the vatican praising virtues about Clinton. You and I do not have the luxury of being in high places or enjoying special privileges. I think the matter is highly controversial depending on what aspect you examine it. In any event I still do not think that the independent council is going to win its case. In fact the latest poll now shows that Clinton's approval rating went up 6 points over night. Frank